ReviewLeadership in health services (Bradford, England)2025
Responsible artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare: a paradigm shift in leadership and strategic management.
Review in Leadership in health services (Bradford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A dialectical lens for AI and medical humanities: advancing responsible augmented humanism in Digital Public Health.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Quantitative evaluation and optimization of AI policy and regulatory texts for smart healthcare.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis paper aims to explore the paradigm shift in leadership and strategic management driven by the integration of responsible artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare. It explores the evolving role of leadership in adapting to AI technologies while ensuring ethical governance, transparency and accountability in healthcare decision-making. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: This study conducts a comprehensive review of current literature, case studies and industry reports to evaluate the implications of responsible AI adoption in healthcare leadership. It focuses on key areas such as AI-driven decision-making, resource optimisation, crisis management and patient care, while also addressing challenges in integrating AI technologies effectively.
findingsThe integration of AI in healthcare is transforming leadership from traditional, experience-based decision-making to data-driven, AI-enhanced strategies. Responsible leadership emphasises addressing ethical concerns such as bias, transparency and accountability. AI technologies improve resource allocation, crisis management and patient care, but challenges such as workforce resistance and the need for upskilling healthcare professionals remain. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Healthcare leaders must adopt a responsible leadership framework that balances AI's potential with ethical and human-centred care principles. Recommendations include developing AI literacy programmes for healthcare professionals, ensuring inclusivity in AI algorithms and establishing governance policies that promote transparency and accountability in AI applications. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This paper provides a critical, forward-looking perspective on how responsible AI can drive a paradigm shift in healthcare leadership. It offers novel insights into the integration of AI within healthcare organisations, emphasising the need for leadership that prioritises ethical AI usage and promotes patient well-being in a rapidly evolving digital landscape.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.