Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40911358›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral addictions2025

Forms of interventions for problematic usage of the internet: A scoping review.

Irene P Carvalho, Artemisa R Dores, Ilaria Cataldo, Valeria Catalani, Luca Pellegrini, Elisabeth Prevete, Natalie Hall, Thomas Zandonai, Andres Roman-Urrestarazu, Julius Burkauskas and 6 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Irene P Carvalho1 Medical Psychology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7981-4442
Artemisa R Dores3 Escola Superior de Saúde, Politécnico do Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4595-9816
Ilaria Cataldo5 Addiction Science Lab, Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Trento, Rovereto,Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3969-4455
Valeria Catalani6 School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6338-8653
Luca Pellegrini6 School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2855-2865
Elisabeth Prevete10 Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8053-7662
Natalie Hall6 School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3635-7699
Thomas Zandonai5 Addiction Science Lab, Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Trento, Rovereto,Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7606-9675
Andres Roman-Urrestarazu12 Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2405-9432
Julius Burkauskas13 Laboratory of Behavioral Medicine, Neuroscience Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Palanga, Lithuania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3928-2151
Alessandro Carollo5 Addiction Science Lab, Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Trento, Rovereto,Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2737-0218
Gianluca Esposito5 Addiction Science Lab, Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Trento, Rovereto,Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9442-0254
Jose M Menchon14 Department of Psychiatry, Bellvitge University Hospital-IDIBELL, Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Barcelona, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6231-6524
Hans-Jürgen Rumpf15 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6848-920X
Zsolt Demetrovics16 College of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5604-7551
Ornella Corazza5 Addiction Science Lab, Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Trento, Rovereto,Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7371-319X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: This scoping review aims to identify current forms of interventions for Problematic Usage of the Internet (PUI) to inform more effective intervention and policy-making initiatives grounded in robust empirical evidence. Methods: The search was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, and PsycINFO databases until October 12, 2024. Empirical research presenting data on interventions for PUI and written in English was included without restrictions of age groups, types of interventions, or types of PUI. Results: Five main forms of interventions for PUI were identified in the 77 studies included in the review, namely, pharmacotherapy, transcranial direct current stimulation, physical exercise, electroacupuncture, and psychotherapy or educational programs. Most studies were conducted in Asian and Middle-Eastern countries, and various validated instruments were used to assess PUI. Psychotherapy and education were the most common interventions in research. Apart from time spent online, positive results of the various interventions were reported on the respective PUI scales in most studies. However, studies with rigorous designs showed non-significant changes, suggesting that methodological differences may influence the reported outcomes. Discussion and conclusions: The different interventions reflect the multidimensional nature and complexity of PUI treatment and prevention strategies. Although current interventions show potential, more robust and rigorous study designs are necessary to draw definite conclusions. Further investigation is needed to understand the influence of comorbidities and the impact of individuals actively seeking help on treatment outcomes. Additionally, more substantial evidence is required to evaluate the effectiveness of PUI prevention efforts, particularly considering varying levels of PUI severity.

Indexed as

Internet Addiction DisorderPsychotherapyHumansassessment toolsgaminginternet addictioninternet useintervention modalitiespharmacotherapypreventionproblematic use of the internetpsychotherapysmartphonetime spent online

Identifiers

PMID40911358
PMCPMC12486281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.