Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40911347›Full record

ArticleInternational biomechanics2025

Assessing single camera markerless motion capture with OpenSim inverse kinematics during upper limb activities of daily living.

Bradley Scott, Mhairi McInnes, Edward K Chadwick, Dimitra Blana

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International biomechanics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bradley ScottSchool of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Mhairi McInnesSchool of Engineering, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Edward K ChadwickSchool of Engineering, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Dimitra BlanaSchool of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates the accuracy of single camera markerless motion capture (SCMoCap) using Microsoft's Azure Kinect, enhanced with inverse kinematics (IK) via OpenSim, for upper limb movement analysis. Twelve healthy adults performed ten upper-limb tasks, recorded simultaneously by OptiTrack (marker-based) and Azure Kinect (markerless) from frontal and sagittal views. Joint angles were calculated using two methods: (1) direct kinematics based on body coordinate frames and (2) inverse kinematics using OpenSim's IK tool with anatomical keypoints. Accuracy was evaluated using root mean square error (RMSE) and Bland-Altman analysis. Results indicated that the IK method slightly improved joint angle agreement with OptiTrack for simpler movements, with an average RMSE of 8° for shoulder elevation in the sagittal plane compared to 9° with the coordinate frame method. However, both methods had higher RMSEs for rotational measurements, with IK and coordinate frame methods at 21° for shoulder rotation in the sagittal plane. Forearm pronation-supination measurements were unreliable due to tracking limitations. These findings suggest that Kinect with IK improves accuracy for simpler movements but struggles with rotational joint mechanics. Future research should focus on enhancing markerless tracking algorithms to fully realise the benefits of IK.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingSoftwareUpper ExtremityAdultAlgorithmsBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleMotion CaptureMovementRange of Motion, ArticularYoung AdultAzure Kinectinverse kinematicsMarkerlessOpenSimupper limb analysis

Identifiers

PMID40911347
PMCPMC12416023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.