Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40911335›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025

Utilizing Causal Network Markers to Identify Tipping Points ahead of Critical Transition.

Shirui Bian, Zezhou Wang, Siyang Leng, Wei Lin, Jifan Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Utilizing Causal Network Markers to Identify Tipping Points ahead of Critical Transition.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shirui BianSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3017-2140
Zezhou WangShanghai Center for Mathematical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3377-0327
Siyang LengResearch Institute of Intelligent Complex Systems, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2285-4758
Wei LinSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1863-4306
Jifan ShiResearch Institute of Intelligent Complex Systems, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2471-0686

Funding

AI for Science Foundation of Fudan University FudanX24AI041National Key R&D Program Grant no. 2022YFC2704604National Natural Science Foundation of China 12531018National Natural Science Foundation of China 42450192National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant no. 11925103National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant no. 12301620National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant no. 123B2021SMEC Grant no. 2023ZKZD04STCSM 22JC1401402STCSM 22JC1402500STCSM Grant nos. 2021SHZDZX0103the Shanghai Municipal Data Bureau special fund for urban digital transformation Grantno.202401065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early-warning signals of delicate design are used to predict critical transitions in complex systems, which makes it possible to render the systems far away from the catastrophic state by introducing timely interventions. Traditional signals including the dynamical network biomarker (DNB), based on statistical properties such as variance and autocorrelation of nodal dynamics, overlook directional interactions and thus have limitations in capturing underlying mechanisms and simultaneously sustaining robustness against noise perturbations. This study therefore introduces a framework of causal network markers (CNMs) by incorporating causality indicators, which reflect the directional influence between variables. Actually, to detect and identify the tipping points ahead of critical transition, two markers are designed: the causal network marker from Granger causality (CNM-GC), for linear causality, and the causal network marker from transfer entropy (CNM-TE), for non-linear causality, as well as a functional representation of different causality indicators and a clustering technique to verify the system's dominant group. Through demonstrations using computational benchmark models and real-world datasets of epileptic seizure, the framework of CNMs shows higher predictive power and accuracy than the traditional DNB. It is believed that, due to the versatility and scalability, the CNMs are suitable for comprehensively evaluating the systems. The most possible direction for application includes the identification of tipping points in clinical disease.

Indexed as

causal network markerearly‐warning signalidentification of clinical disease

Identifiers

PMID40911335
PMCPMC12622457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.