Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40911284›Full record

ArticleSystematic biology2026

The Comparative Analysis of Lineage-Pair Traits.

Sean A S Anderson, Sachin Kaushik, Daniel R Matute

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Adaptive molecular convergence is pervasive across deep time and largely decoupled from phenotypic convergence.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Genomic analyses inEvolution letters · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sean A S AndersonSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, 310 Ferst Dr NW, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Sachin KaushikDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 120 South Rd, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Daniel R MatuteDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 120 South Rd, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

Funding

Drivers and consequences of introgression in evolutionR35GM148244 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Daniel Matute · 2023 to 2026
$2.2M
Georgia Institute of TechnologyNIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM148244NIGMS NIH HHS R35GM148244
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For many questions in ecology and evolution, the most relevant data to consider are attributes of lineage pairs. Comparative tests for causal relationships among such lineage-pair traits as "diet niche overlap," "divergence time," and "strength of reproductive isolation (RI)"-measured for pairwise combinations of related species or populations-have led to several groundbreaking insights, but the correct statistical approach for these analyses has never been clear. Lineage-pair traits are non-independent, but unlike the expected covariance among species' traits, which is captured by a phylogenetic covariance matrix arising from a given model, the expected covariance among lineage-pair traits has not been explicitly formulated. Analyses of pairwise-defined data have thus employed untested workarounds for non-independence rather than direct models of lineage-pair covariance, with consequences that are unexplored. Here, we consider how evolutionary relatedness among taxa translates into non-independence among taxonomic pairs. We develop models by which phylogenetic signal in an underlying character generates covariance among pairs in a lineage-pair trait. We incorporate the resulting lineage-pair covariance matrices into modified versions of phylogenetic generalized least squares and a new phylogenetic beta regression for bounded response variables. Both outperform previous approaches in simulation tests. We find that a common heuristic method, node averaging, imparts a greater cost to model performance than does the non-independence it was designed to correct. We re-analyze two empirical datasets to find dramatic improvements in model fit and, in the case of avian hybridization data, an even stronger relationship between pair age and RI than is revealed from uncorrected analysis. We finally present a new tool, the R package phylopairs, that allows empiricists to test relationships among pairwise-defined variables in a way that is statistically robust and more straightforward to implement.

Indexed as

ClassificationModels, BiologicalPhylogenyAnimalsBiological EvolutionComparative analysiscomparative studies in speciation; phylogenetic comparative methodsspecies-pairs

Identifiers

PMID40911284
PMCPMC13016640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.