ArticleDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology2025
Bilateral multiple retinal pigment epithelial detachments.
Article in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo report a rare case of bilateral idiopathic multifocal retinal pigment epithelial detachments (imfPEDs) and to describe the long-term morphological and functional changes observed over a 16-year follow-up period.
methodsA 49-year-old woman was diagnosed with imfPEDs based on multimodal imaging, including optical coherence tomography (OCT), fluorescein angiography (FA), and fundus photography. Full-field electroretinograms (ffERGs) and multifocal ERGs (mfERGs) were recorded to assess retinal function. The patient voluntarily discontinued follow-up but returned 16 years later due to cataract progression. Retinal morphology and function were re-evaluated using comparable multimodal imaging and electrophysiological methods.
resultsAt the initial visit, multiple bilateral pigment epithelial detachments (PEDs) were identified. OCT showed hyporeflective, dome-shaped PEDs with smooth borders, and ERG responses were within normal limits. Sixteen years later, some PEDs had resolved, others had newly developed or fused, and geographic atrophy was observed, particularly in the peripheral retina. Fundus autofluorescence (FAF), performed in place of FA, revealed hyperautofluorescent PEDs and numerous peripheral hypofluorescent spots. ffERGs remained normal, while mfERGs showed localized attenuation with relatively preserved macular function. These findings were consistent with large colloid drusen and cuticular drusen.
conclusionThis case demonstrates the slow morphological progression and relative functional preservation in bilateral imfPEDs over 16 years. Comparable multimodal imaging and electrophysiological testing were valuable in monitoring the long-term clinical course and support the classification of this phenotype as a variant of large colloid or cuticular drusen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.