ArticleMolecular biotechnology2026
A Comparative Study of Transfection Techniques for Genetic Modification in Chicken Primordial Germ Cells.
Article in Molecular biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generation of DFNA5-deficient chickens reveals a species-specific role of pyroptosis in avian antiviral immunity.Transgenic research · 2026Article
- Genome Editing in the Chicken: From PGC-Mediated Germline Transmission to Advanced Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Avian species possess a distinct reproductive system that differs fundamentally from mammals, resulting in relatively slower progress in transgenic poultry research compared to mammalian models. Primordial germ cells (PGCs), as the precursors to functional gametes, provide a promising avenue for the utilization of genetic resources and the application of transgenesis in chickens. However, the transfection of chicken PGCs remains challenging due to the low efficiency of conventional methods. This study systematically compared the transient transfection efficiency of chicken PGCs using lipofection, electroporation, adenovirus (ADV), and adeno-associated virus (AAV) to identify the optimal genes delivery approach. Lipofection exhibited less than 5% efficiency at 24 h, whereas electroporation significantly increased transfection efficiency but reduced cell viability at 48 h. Adenoviral vectors achieved the highest delivery efficiency 8-10 fold greater than lipofection, surpassing both lipid-mediated transfection and electroporation, while adeno-associated viruses serotypes showed minimal infectivity in PGCs. Furthermore, ADV-transduced PGCs retained normal migratory capability after transplantation into 2.5-day chicken embryos, confirming that adenoviral infection did not impair their biological functionality. Collectively, our findings established adenoviral delivery as a robust and efficient method for gene transfer in chicken PGCs, enabling precise genome engineering for applications in transgenic avians production and the conservation of endangered poultry genetic resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40911265What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.