Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40911257›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2025

Ambiguities faced by parents who received a genetic diagnosis for autistic offspring with intellectual disabilities.

Robert Klitzman, Ekaterina Bezborodko, Wendy K Chung, Paul S Appelbaum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robert KlitzmanProfessor of Psychiatry and Director, Masters of Bioethics Program, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. rlk2@cumc.columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6827-8063
Ekaterina BezborodkoDepartment of Law Ethics and Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Wendy K ChungBoston Children's Hospital and Mary Ellen Avery Professor, Harvard Medical School Boston, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3438-5685
Paul S AppelbaumCenter for of Law, Ethics and Psychiatry, Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1940-0042

Funding

Center for Research on Ethical, Legal & Social Implications of Psychiatric, Neurologic & Behavioral GeneticsRM1HG007257 · NHGRI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI APPELBAUM, PAUL STUART · 2018 to 2021
$4.4M
National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), Center for Excellence in ELSI Research (CEER) RM1HG007257NHGRI NIH HHS RM1 HG007257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic testing is now routinely recommended for autism and/or intellectual disability (ID), but how parents deal with the uncertainties that may be involved has not been explored. We interviewed 28 parents who had received results identifying de novo genetic variants responsible for their offspring's autism. Parents faced six broad types of ambiguities concerning: cause of the de novo variant, likelihood of medical manifestations, children's future independence and support needs, availability of future medical benefits/treatments, potential social benefits and potential social harms. These ambiguities prompted anxiety/stress. Parents tried to manage these uncertainties in several ways: focusing on the child's immediate needs, seeking more information, seeking bases of comparison in other children, monitoring for future symptoms (and often enlisting others to do so), seeking metaphors and conceptual frameworks to understand uncertainties, making and accepting trade-offs, and participating in research. Several factors influence these uncertainties and responses, including age/life-stage of the child, psychological factors, concerns about the future of the broader healthcare and insurance systems, potential differences due to geography (e.g., local variations in medical, social and educational services available) and scientific background and literacy. Members of a couple also often perceive and respond to these issues differently. These data, the first to examine the ambiguities that arise when receiving genetic diagnoses for their autistic offspring with ID, reveal the key roles of several social factors and have important implications for future research, education of families, and training and practice of healthcare providers, teachers, social service agencies, policymakers and others.

Indexed as

AutismCopingGeneticsIntellectual disabilityPhenotypic variationUncertainties

Identifiers

PMID40911257
PMCPMC12569323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.