Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40911206›Full record

ArticleGeroScience2026

Distinct factors explain life space mobility below and above the age of 75 years old in older adults.

Samar Assadi Khalil, Efrat Gil, Roy Tzemah-Shahar, Faisal Azaiza, Rachel Kizony, Maayan Agmon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samar Assadi KhalilFaculty of Social Welfare & Health Sciences, The Cheryl Spencer Department of Nursing, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Efrat GilDivision of Geriatrics, Israeli Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel.
Roy Tzemah-ShaharFaculty of Social Welfare & Health Sciences, The Cheryl Spencer Department of Nursing, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Faisal AzaizaFaculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, School of Social Work, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Rachel Kizony *Faculty of Social Welfare & Health Sciences, Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Maayan Agmon *Faculty of Social Welfare & Health Sciences, The Cheryl Spencer Department of Nursing, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel. agmon.mn@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1855-1199

Funding

the Israel National Institute for Health Services and Health Policy Research. 217-18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Life space mobility (LSM) is important for participation in daily life. It is influenced by individual and environmental factors and tends to decline with age. Although LSM has been studied in older adults, stratification of this population into age subgroups has not been performed, creating a gap in understanding the factors associated with LSM in a more granular manner. This cross-sectional study aimed to identify the factors associated with LSM in community-dwelling older adults below and above the age of 75. Participants aged 65 and older without neurological conditions or dementia were recruited. LSM was assessed using the Life Space Assessment (LSA), mobility with the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), cognition with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), fear of falling with the Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale (ABC), and depression with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Additional self-reported data included employment/volunteering, frequency of leaving the house, functional status, and number of medications. Separate regression models were conducted for each age subgroup. Two-hundred forty-two older adults (28.9% men) were recruited (mean (SD) age 73.7(6.4) years), with 40.9% aged over 75. In the younger subgroup, sex, frequency of leaving the house, TUG, and employment/volunteer status significantly explained 42.8% of the variance in LSM. In the older subgroup, sex, age, ABC, MoCA, and TUG significantly explained 46.9% of the variance in LSM. Distinct factors are associated with LSM in each age subgroup. Accordingly, future interventions should be tailored for each subgroup individually.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingGeriatric AssessmentMobility LimitationAccidental FallsAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAging in PlaceCognitionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndependent LivingMalePostural BalanceCognitionFear of fallingLife space mobilityMobilityOlder adults

Identifiers

PMID40911206
PMCPMC13356143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.