Observational studyLangenbeck's archives of surgery2025
Ergonomic stress and surgical performance of general surgeons: a cross-sectional comparison of laparoscopic and open procedures.
Observational study in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgeons are actively seeking ways to enhance operating room ergonomics. A comprehensive report on surgeon job-related disease and injuries could raise awareness, encourage workplace improvements, and emphasize the importance of ergonomic practices such as body posture awareness, appropriate operating room setup, and exercise to lessen discomfort and improve general health. PURPOSE: To address the ergonomic challenges that surgeons in Jordan face during their work and to investigate how demographic variables may impact a surgeon's ability to perform open and laparoscopic procedures proficiently.
methodsThis cross-sectional observational study investigated the ergonomics of surgical practice and evaluated the impact of demographic factors on the proficiency of surgeons performing both open and laparoscopic procedures. Using a self-administered questionnaire, data were gathered from 150 Jordanian doctors who had completed more than six months of surgical training and were employed by the government, the military, or the private sector.
resultsIn this study involving 150 surgeons in Jordan, demographic characteristics were assessed, revealing that male respondents, particularly from the military sector, had higher mean scores in both laparoscopic and open surgical approaches. Multiple linear regression analysis identified private institutions and military affiliation as significant positive predictors for achieving high scores in laparoscopic procedures, while exclusive military affiliation emerged as the sole significant predictor for open procedures.
conclusionThe study highlights surgical ergonomics' role in reducing pain and improving outcomes. Prioritizing appropriate ergonomic training, encouraging discomfort reporting, and raising awareness of official recommendations are critical for the longevity of surgeons' careers, well-being, and, ultimately, better patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.