ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025
A Replicable and Generalizable Neuroimaging-Based Indicator of Pain Sensitivity Across Individuals.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whole-brain mapping of TMS-induced discomfort with large-scale concurrent TMS-fMRI.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A Replicable and Generalizable Neuroimaging-Based Indicator of Pain Sensitivity Across Individuals.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Advances and challenges in neuroimaging-based pain biomarkers.Cell reports. Medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Revealing the neural underpinnings of pain sensitivity is crucial for understanding how the brain encodes individual differences in pain and advancing personalized pain treatments. Here, six large and diverse functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) datasets (total N = 1046) are leveraged to uncover the neural mechanisms of pain sensitivity. Replicable and generalizable correlations are found between nociceptive-evoked fMRI responses and pain sensitivity for laser heat, contact heat, and mechanical pains. These fMRI responses correlate more strongly with pain sensitivity than with tactile, auditory, and visual sensitivity. Moreover, a machine learning model is developed that accurately predicts not only pain sensitivity (r = 0.20∼0.56, ps < 0.05) but also analgesic effects of different treatments in healthy individuals (r = 0.17∼0.25, ps < 0.05). Notably, these findings are influenced considerably by sample sizes, requiring >200 for univariate whole brain correlation analysis and >150 for multivariate machine learning modeling. Altogether, this study demonstrates that fMRI activations encode pain sensitivity across various types of pain, thus facilitating interpretations of subjective pain reports and promoting more mechanistically informed investigations into pain physiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.