Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40911184›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025

A Replicable and Generalizable Neuroimaging-Based Indicator of Pain Sensitivity Across Individuals.

Li-Bo Zhang, Xue-Jing Lu, Hui-Juan Zhang, Zhao-Xing Wei, Ya-Zhuo Kong, Yi-Heng Tu, Gian Domenico Iannetti, Li Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Li-Bo ZhangState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7500-7985
Xue-Jing LuState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
Hui-Juan ZhangState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
Zhao-Xing WeiState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
Ya-Zhuo KongState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
Yi-Heng TuState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
Gian Domenico IannettiNeuroscience and Behaviour Laboratory, Italian Institute of Technology, Rome, 00161, Italy.
Li HuState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7003-2903

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation JQ22018Beijing Natural Science Foundation L246074National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFC2508702National Natural Science Foundation of China 32071061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Revealing the neural underpinnings of pain sensitivity is crucial for understanding how the brain encodes individual differences in pain and advancing personalized pain treatments. Here, six large and diverse functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) datasets (total N = 1046) are leveraged to uncover the neural mechanisms of pain sensitivity. Replicable and generalizable correlations are found between nociceptive-evoked fMRI responses and pain sensitivity for laser heat, contact heat, and mechanical pains. These fMRI responses correlate more strongly with pain sensitivity than with tactile, auditory, and visual sensitivity. Moreover, a machine learning model is developed that accurately predicts not only pain sensitivity (r = 0.20∼0.56, ps < 0.05) but also analgesic effects of different treatments in healthy individuals (r = 0.17∼0.25, ps < 0.05). Notably, these findings are influenced considerably by sample sizes, requiring >200 for univariate whole brain correlation analysis and >150 for multivariate machine learning modeling. Altogether, this study demonstrates that fMRI activations encode pain sensitivity across various types of pain, thus facilitating interpretations of subjective pain reports and promoting more mechanistically informed investigations into pain physiology.

Indexed as

BrainNeuroimagingPainPain ThresholdAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePain MeasurementYoung Adultfunctional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)individual differencesmachine learningneural indicatorpain sensitivitysample size

Identifiers

PMID40911184
PMCPMC12667548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.