Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40911159›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Enhancing Breast Density Assessment in Mammograms Through Artificial Intelligence.

Naila Camila da Rocha, Abner Macola Pacheco Barbosa, Yaron Oliveira Schnr, Lucas Dias Borges Peres, Luis Gustavo Modelli de Andrade, Guilherme Jordao de Magalhaes Rosa, Eduardo Carvalho Pessoa, Jose Eduardo Corrente, Liciana Vaz de Arruda Silveira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Naila Camila da RochaUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, 1675 Observatory Dr, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. ndarocha@wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1684-2574
Abner Macola Pacheco BarbosaUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, 1675 Observatory Dr, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3668-8911
Yaron Oliveira SchnrSao Paulo State University (UNESP), Rubião Jr, Botucatu, São Paulo, SP, 18618-687, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2864-988X
Lucas Dias Borges PeresSao Paulo State University (UNESP), Rubião Jr, Botucatu, São Paulo, SP, 18618-687, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4694-1836
Luis Gustavo Modelli de AndradeSao Paulo State University (UNESP), Rubião Jr, Botucatu, São Paulo, SP, 18618-687, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0230-0766
Guilherme Jordao de Magalhaes RosaUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, 1675 Observatory Dr, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9172-6461
Eduardo Carvalho PessoaSao Paulo State University (UNESP), Rubião Jr, Botucatu, São Paulo, SP, 18618-687, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8330-0222
Jose Eduardo CorrenteSao Paulo State University (UNESP), Rubião Jr, Botucatu, São Paulo, SP, 18618-687, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5478-4996
Liciana Vaz de Arruda SilveiraSao Paulo State University (UNESP), Rubião Jr, Botucatu, São Paulo, SP, 18618-687, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8931-5495

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women worldwide. Early detection through mammography significantly improves outcomes, with breast density acting as both a risk factor and a key interpretive feature. Although the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) provides standardized density categories, assessments are often subjective and variable. While automated tools exist, most are proprietary and resource-intensive, limiting their use in underserved settings. There is a critical need for accessible, low-cost AI solutions that provide consistent breast density classification. This study aims to develop and evaluate an open-source, computer vision-based approach using deep learning techniques for objective breast density assessment in mammography images, with a focus on accessibility, consistency, and applicability in resource-limited healthcare environments. Our approach integrates a custom-designed convolutional neural network (CD-CNN) with an extreme learning machine (ELM) layer for image-based breast density classification. The retrospective dataset includes 10,371 full-field digital mammography images, previously categorized by radiologists into one of four BI-RADS breast density categories (A-D). The proposed model achieved a testing accuracy of 95.4%, with a specificity of 98.0% and a sensitivity of 92.5%. Agreement between the automated breast density classification and the specialists' consensus was strong, with a weighted kappa of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.82-0.98). On the external and independent mini-MIAS dataset, the model achieved an accuracy of 73.9%, a precision of 81.1%, a specificity of 87.3%, and a sensitivity of 75.1%, which is comparable to the performance reported in previous studies using this dataset. The proposed approach advances breast density assessment in mammograms, enhancing accuracy and consistency to support early breast cancer detection.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBreast DensityBreast NeoplasmsMammographyRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedBreastConvolutional Neural NetworksDeep LearningFemaleHumansRetrospective StudiesBreast cancerBreast densityComputer-aided diagnosisConvolutional neural networksMammography

Identifiers

PMID40911159
PMCPMC13230292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.