ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Interpretable machine learning model predicts 1-year inguinal hernia risk after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcomes of inguinal hernia repair after implantation of preperitoneal reservoir for artificial urinary sphincter or penile implant.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Large registries, rare outcomes and neutral/inconclusive machine learning results in abdominal wall surgery.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2026Article
- Towards precision medicine in Tourette syndrome: a perspective on AI-driven predictive modelling and personalised care.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Review
- Role of Robotic Surgery and Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Abdominal Wall Hernias: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Letter to the editor: interpretable machine learning model predicts 1‑year inguinal hernia risk after robot‑assisted radical prostatectomy.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Comment on: "Interpretable machine learning model predicts 1-year inguinal hernia risk after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy".Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inguinal hernia represents a clinically significant yet underreported complication of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for localized prostate cancer, with a notably high incidence within the first postoperative year. Despite its adverse impact on quality of life and potential for severe sequelae, predictive tools for this outcome remain limited. To develop and validate the first machine learning (ML)-based clinical prediction model for inguinal hernia within 1 year after RARP, leveraging explainable artificial intelligence (AI) techniques for clinical interpretability. This retrospective study analyzed localized prostate cancer patients who underwent RARP between June 1, 2021 and May 1, 2023 at our center. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression identified five key predictors from multiple clinical parameters. Five ML algorithms were developed and evaluated on a 70:30 training-test split. Model performance was assessed via area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, specificity, and decision curve analysis (DCA). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) methodology provided interpretable feature attribution. The final analysis included 652 eligible patients. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) demonstrated superior discriminative ability, with an AUC of 0.833 (95% CI: 0.770-0.895) in the validation set and 0.791 (95% CI: 0.734-0.848) in the test set. SHAP analysis identified five critical predictors ranked by impact: age, body mass index (BMI), preoperative albumin level, T stage, and history of abdominal surgery. This study established the first ML-driven predictive model for post-RARP inguinal hernia, with XGBoost demonstrating optimal performance. High-risk patients identified by the model warrant personalized proactive interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.