ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2025
Predictors of early progressive disease and antitumor effects by metastatic site in renal cell carcinoma treated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab.
Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-world efficacy and toxicity of ipilimumab and nivolumab as a first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma according to IMDC risk criteria-A multi-center retrospective analysis on behalf of the GUARDIANS group.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- A real-world comparison of nivolumab plus cabozantinib and pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib focusing on safety outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results from the JK-FOOT consortium.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite durable benefits of ipilimumab and nivolumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), early progressive disease (PD), defined as disease progression within 3 months, occurs, and its predictors remain unclear. We aimed to investigate the clinical factors associated with early PD in patients with mRCC treated with this regimen.
methodsA retrospective analysis of a multi-institutional database identified 193 patients with mRCC treated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab. Logistic regression analyses assessed associations between clinical factors and early PD.
resultsDuring a median follow-up of 17 months, patients had median overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of 35 and 14 months, respectively. Objective response and PD rates were 49.9% and 24.9%, respectively. Patients with early PD had significantly worse OS than those with non-early PD (10 vs. 42 months; P = 0.0002). Multivariate analyses identified bone metastasis and performance status (PS) as independent indicators of early PD (P = 0.03 and 0.01, respectively). Early PD rates varied by metastatic site (lung, 19.3%; bone, 31.2%; brain, 10%; and liver, 30%). Patients with clear-cell RCC had a median OS of 48 months and PFS of 22 months. The identified variables of early PD were consistent across all patient populations evaluated.
conclusionsBone metastasis and PS predict early PD in patients with mRCC treated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab, with antitumor effect of the regimen varying by metastatic site. Clarifying the characteristics of early PD may guide clinical decision-making in treatment selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40911129What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.