ArticleMaternal and child health journal2025
Care Coordination Satisfaction Survey for Families of Children and Youth with Special Healthcare Needs.
Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCare coordination can be an essential source of support to families of children with special health care needs and should ideally lead to improvements in the organization of care. PURPOSE: This publication aims to share the experience of one statewide Title V organization's work to develop and validate a care coordination satisfaction survey. DESCRIPTION: UIC-DSCC engaged with the Family Advisory Council and a Family Survey Committee to revise existing surveys measuring different care coordination domains. The overall consensus was to apply a 13-item annual care coordination satisfaction survey. The survey was administered to families between January and April 2023. Psychometric reviews included exploratory Factor Analysis for the underlying structure of the items and Cronbach α for reliability. A top-box approach was used to represent item proportion. ASSESSMENT: 899 families completed the 13-item measure. The Exploratory Factor Analysis determined a 2-factor solution: (1) Care Coordination Satisfaction and (2) Engagement and Impact on Quality of Life-none of the items required removal. Factor 1's top-box results show families' positive experience with care coordination, with 6.37 of the seven questions being answered with the most favorable answer. Similarly, in factor 2, 5.28 of the six questions were responded to with the top or most favorable answer.
conclusionFamily partnership is a crucial part of the care coordination process, and UIC-DSCC has learned that this partnership is also critical when evaluating family satisfaction with care coordination services. The 13-item care coordination survey demonstrated adequacy and can assist with quality improvement in care coordination programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.