Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40911117›Full record

ReviewThe Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology2025

Reperfusion injury in STEMI: a double-edged sword.

Krupa Sara Thomas, Divina Mariya Puthooran, Sudeep Edpuganti, Adi Lakshmi Reddem, Angela Jose, Subramanya Sri Mahesh Akula

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Krupa Sara ThomasDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia. krupasara22@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-9750-4415
Divina Mariya PuthooranDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-7438-8998
Sudeep EdpugantiDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4857-4399
Adi Lakshmi ReddemDepartment of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Georgia, Tbilisi, Georgia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-1601-9722
Angela JoseDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-3426-7406
Subramanya Sri Mahesh AkulaDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-7210-0974

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a major cardiac event that requires rapid reperfusion therapy. The same reperfusion mechanism that minimizes infarct size and mortality may paradoxically exacerbate further cardiac damage-a condition known as reperfusion injury. Oxidative stress, calcium excess, mitochondrial malfunction, and programmed cell death mechanisms make myocardial dysfunction worse. Even with the best revascularization techniques, reperfusion damage still jeopardizes the long-term prognosis and myocardial healing.

methodsA thorough narrative review was carried out using some of the most well-known scientific databases, including ScienceDirect, PubMed, and Google Scholar. With an emphasis on pathophysiological causes, clinical manifestations, innovative biomarkers, imaging modalities, artificial intelligence applications, and developing treatment methods related to reperfusion injury, peer-reviewed publications published between 2015 and 2025 were highlighted. MAIN BODY: The review focuses on the molecular processes that underlie cardiac reperfusion injury, such as reactive oxygen species, calcium dysregulation, opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore, and several types of programmed cell death. Clinical syndromes such as myocardial stunning, coronary no-reflow, and intramyocardial hemorrhage are thoroughly studied-all of which lead to negative consequences like heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging along with coronary angiography and significant biomarkers like N-terminal proBNP and soluble ST2 aid in risk stratification and prognosis. In addition to mechanical techniques like ischemia postconditioning and remote ischemic conditioning, pharmacological treatments are also examined. Despite promising research findings, the majority of therapies have not yet proven consistently effective in extensive clinical studies. Consideration of sex-specific risk factors, medicines that target the mitochondria, tailored therapies, and the use of artificial intelligence for risk assessment and early diagnosis are some potential future avenues.

conclusionReperfusion damage continues to be a significant obstacle to the best possible recovery after STEMI, even with improvements in revascularization. The management of STEMI still relies heavily on early reperfusion, although adjuvant medicines that target reperfusion injury specifically are desperately needed. Molecular-targeted approaches, AI-driven risk assessment, and precision medicine advancements have the potential to reduce cardiac damage and enhance long-term outcomes for patients with STEMI.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceCardioprotectionIschemia–reperfusion injuryMitochondrial dysfunctionNo-reflow phenomenonOxidative stressPrimary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI)Reperfusion injurySTEMI

Identifiers

PMID40911117
PMCPMC12413384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.