ArticleVeterinary research communications2025
Ectoparasites of opossum's (Didelphimorphia: Didelphidae) captured in an urban complex in the Northern Brazilian amazon: new hosts and research on hemotropic bacteria.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ticks and mites are important ectoparasites that affect animal and human health, directly causing harm and acting as vectors of pathogens. This study investigated the ectoparasites of synanthropic didelphids marsupials in northern Amazonia, Brazil, and screened them for hemotropic bacteria. The study was carried out in October 2022 in the metropolitan region of Macapá, Amapá State, Brazil, in vegetation remnants characterized by terra firme rainforest, alluvial forest, and savanna. Sampling was conducted over 12 consecutive days using live traps (Tomahawk and Shanon) and pitfall traps for capturing small wild mammals. The ectoparasites were removed using tweezers. A fraction of the collected ectoparasites was separated for DNA extraction and subsequent PCR amplification, and an aliquot of the extracted DNA was used for pathogen molecular tests, including bacteria and protozoa. A total of 26 larvae of Amblyomma dissimile, 17 nymphs of Amblyomma humerale, and more than 20 larvae of Eutrombicula goeldii were analyzed. Molecular identification confirmed the identity of A. dissimile and A. humerale, with new host records for Didelphis imperfecta and Didelphis marsupialis, respectively. The 16 S rRNA gene amplified successfully for 38.5% of A. dissimile larvae and all A. humerale nymphs, while the 18 S rRNA gene failed for chiggers. Pathogen screening yielded negative results. These findings contribute to the knowledge of host-parasite interactions and highlight the need for further surveillance of potential zoonotic agents in ectoparasites from wildlife.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40911094What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.