Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40911074›Full record

Trial reportEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Validated intraoperative bleeding severity scale (VIBe) for hemostasis assessment in lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Namhoo Kim, Sub-Ri Park, Jae Won Shin, Ji-Won Kwon, Si-Young Park, Jin-Oh Park, Kyung-Soo Suk, Seong-Hwan Moon, Hak-Sun Kim, Byung Ho Lee

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Namhoo KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sub-Ri ParkDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jae Won ShinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ji-Won KwonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Si-Young ParkDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jin-Oh ParkDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyung-Soo SukDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seong-Hwan MoonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hak-Sun KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Byung Ho LeeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. bhlee96@yuhs.ac.

Funding

Baxter International GKR 11553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIntraoperative bleeding remains a major challenge in lumbar spine surgery, with conventional assessment methods lacking standardization. The Validated Intraoperative Bleeding Severity Scale (VIBe) is a structured five-grade tool developed to objectively assess bleeding severity across surgical fields. This study evaluated the clinical utility of VIBe in lumbar spinal fusion by comparing it with conventional bleeding metrics across various hemostatic strategies, including hypotensive anesthesia and local hemostatic agent use.

methodsIn this prospective, randomized controlled trial, 70 patients undergoing elective posterior lumbar decompression and fusion were randomized to normotensive or hypotensive anesthesia. Each group was further divided by hemostatic strategy: active agents alone or a combination of active and passive agents. VIBe grades were independently recorded by the surgeon and assistant for each bleeding site. Conventional bleeding metrics-including estimated blood loss (EBL), transfusion volume, and drain output-were also collected. Between group comparisons and inter-rater agreement were assessed, and correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the association between the VIBe and conventional bleeding metrics.

resultsVIBe grades improved significantly after hemostasis in all patients (p < 0.001). Although intraoperative blood pressures were significantly lower in the hypotensive group, there were no significant differences in transfusion volume, EBL, drain output, or VIBe-based assessments. Outcomes were also comparable between patients receiving combined versus active-only hemostatic agents. Inter-rater agreement for VIBe scores before hemostasis, after hemostasis, and for score changes was near-perfect (κ = 0.934, 0.834, and 0.856 respectively, all p < 0.001). Operator-assigned VIBe scores significantly correlated with EBL (ρ = 0.305, p = 0.010) and transfusion volume (ρ = 0.264, p = 0.027); assistant correlated with EBL (ρ = 0.284, p = 0.017).

conclusionVIBe is a reliable and reproducible tool for intraoperative bleeding assessment in lumbar spine fusion. Active hemostatic agents were effective, and the addition of passive agents offered no measurable advantage.

Indexed as

Blood Loss, SurgicalHemostasis, SurgicalLumbar VertebraeSeverity of Illness IndexSpinal FusionAdultAgedFemaleHemostaticsHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesHemostaticsHemostasisIntraoperative bleedingLumbar spineRandomized controlled trialSpinal fusionValidated intraoperative bleeding severity scale

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.