ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2025
Interdisciplinary evidence-based tumor board simulation training in surgical medical education.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEvidence-based medicine (EBM), precision medicine and interdisciplinarity are becoming increasingly important in medical education. The purposeful connection between EBM and interdisciplinary work is given in the context of a tumor board, since therapy decisions are discussed here in an interdisciplinary team based on current evidence-based guidelines. To date, there has been little focus on either topic. Therefore, we aimed to assess the existing knowledge and offered a practical exercise in terms of a tumor board simulation training for medical students during their surgical study semester.
methodsFirst, a knowledge test was performed in 4th year medical students (n = 149) addressing the topic of EBM following an evaluation questionnaire. Subsequently, a structured one hour- lecture was held. The students were divided into groups of up to ten and assigned with specific professional roles of tumor board members. Thereafter, students participated in a live simulated tumor board. At the end the same knowledge test and evaluation questionnaire were delivered (n = 163). Study was conducted at Heidelberg Medical University between 2023 and 2024.
resultsA significant increase in knowledge was seen before versus after the course only in the primarily better students (p < 0.0001). Almost no difference in knowledge test was seen before and after the course pertaining all students (p = 0.205). Evaluation questionnaire displayed that 45% (n = 66) of the students had not dealt with the topic of EBM before the course. 98% (n = 146) of the students considered that interdisciplinary work in medical profession is very important.
conclusionIncluding EBM and precision medicine in a practical way into the medical curriculum is necessarily needed. As only the best students seemed to benefit significantly, a more sustainable approach might be the implementation of a longitudinal precision medicine curriculum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.