Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40911027›Full record

ArticleHistopathology2025

Current practice of pathologic response assessment following chemoimmunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Germany: first real-world data from the multicentre Re-GraDE study.

Felix Elsner, Christiane Kümpers, German Ott, Julia Döring, Katharina Schildknecht, Annette Fisseler-Eckhoff, Maximilian von Laffert, Lea Baier, Luca Giulini, Dietmar Kraus and 11 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Histopathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Felix ElsnerInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9010-7668
Christiane KümpersInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
German OttDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Robert Bosch Hospital and Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7990-6793
Julia DöringDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Robert Bosch Hospital and Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany.
Katharina SchildknechtDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Robert Bosch Hospital and Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany.
Annette Fisseler-EckhoffDepartment of Pathology und Cytology, Dr. Horst-Schmidt-Hospital Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9148-3794
Maximilian von LaffertInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8799-0427
Lea BaierDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum Nuernberg, Paracelsus Medical University Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8919-2798
Luca GiuliniDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum Nuernberg, Paracelsus Medical University Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1864-0930
Dietmar KrausDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum Nuernberg, Paracelsus Medical University Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany.
Jozef ZustinGemeinschaftspraxis Für Pathologie Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9217-466X
Florian WeberInstitute of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Tamas SzökeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Merle KögelInstitute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Annette ArndtInstitute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9764-5074
Verena BücheleInstitute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Hanibal BohnenbergerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1038-1030
Florian FuchsDepartment of Medicine 1, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3928-3331
Christian MatekInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8528-8581
Konrad SteinestelInstitute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6549-9848
Pulmonary Pathology Working Group of the German Society of Pathology

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven that pathologists now frequently assess pathologic response following neoadjuvant or perioperative chemoimmunotherapy for NSCLC, we set up a multicentre study to evaluate the current practice of regression grading in Germany (Re-GraDE NSCLC).

methods133 cases of NSCLC resection specimens following chemoimmunotherapy (IO) were collected from 9 high-volume lung cancer centres in Germany. Case characteristics were obtained from pathology reports/electronic medical records. In 107 cases, pretreatment biopsies were available on-site.

resultsResidual viable tumour (% RVT) was commonly used to measure therapy response (106/133 resection specimens, 79.7%). The entire tumour bed was submitted for histology in 55.6% of cases; however, in 18%, a tumour bed of ≤3 cm was not completely submitted. Either Junker or IASLC regression grading was applied in 97.7% of primary tumours and 60.2% of lymph nodes with comparable results. Almost half of the tumours (45.9%) showed pathological complete response (pCR and/or regression grade (RG) III) with a very weak correlation between % RVT and pretreatment PD-L1 TPS (r

conclusionsOur multicentre study describes the current practice of histopathological regression grading of NSCLC after IO in Germany, highlighting the widespread use of the Junker system, which is basically comparable to IASLC regression grading. For standardization, we recommend following the IASLC guidelines (submitting of the complete tumour bed if ≤3 cm), while the reporting of % RVT might represent a continuous parameter for therapy response. Our digital nationwide registry, which aims to integrate biopsy results, molecular profiling and % RVT in resection specimens, might develop into a valuable tool to investigate novel predictive biomarkers of IO efficacy.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungImmunotherapyLung NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm GradingTreatment Outcomemajor pathologic response (MPR)neoadjuvant immuno‐chemotherapyNSCLCpathological complete response (pCR)PD‐L1residual viable tumour (RVT)

Identifiers

PMID40911027
PMCPMC12605775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.