ArticleJACC. Asia2025
Association and Prognostic Implications of "No-Reflow Phenomenon" and Hypercoagulability in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
Article in JACC. Asia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04650529 (G-NUH), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
G-NUH (Gyeongsang National University Hospital) Registry
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive Value of Apelin-36 for No-Reflow Phenomenon in STEMI Patients.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Risk factors for Post-PCI cardiovascular events in coronary artery disease patients treated with clopidogrel combined with aspirin.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- No-Reflow During Coronary Interventions: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Thrombogenicity and the No-Reflow Phenomenon in STEMI: A Step Toward Personalized Intervention.JACC. Asia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFollowing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the "no-reflow phenomenon" is associated with a worse outcome. However, it remains unclear how to prevent and treat this phenomenon during PCI.
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the association between thrombogenicity profiles and "no-reflow phenomenon" during primary PCI in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
methodsFrom a real-world registry, we prospectively enrolled patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI (n = 334). TIMI flow grade was assessed at final angiography, and the "no-reflow phenomenon" was defined as TIMI flow grade between 0 and 2. Thrombogenicity profiles were assessed with thromboelastography (TEG) and conventional hemostatic measurements.
resultsThirty-seven patients (11.1%) showed no-reflow after primary PCI. High platelet-fibrin clot strength (P-FCS: ≥ 68 mm) measured by TEG was significantly associated with an increased risk of post-PCI "no-reflow phenomenon" (OR: 2.611; 95% CI: 1.220-5.584; P = 0.010). The risk stratification with "no-reflow phenomenon" and "high P-FCS phenotype" appeared to be additive to predict the risk of 3-year clinical event (log-rank P < 0.001 across the groups). Patients with both "no-reflow phenomenon" and high P-FCS had a higher risk of adverse clinical events compared with normal-reflow subjects with low P-FCS (adjusted HR: 6.654; 95% CI: 2.678-16.530; P < 0.001).
conclusionsThis study demonstrated a close relationship between heightened thrombogenicity (assessed by TEG P-FCS) with "no-reflow phenomenon," and their additive prognostic implications after primary PCI in STEMI patients. Effective control of clot strength may reduce the risk of "no-reflow phenomenon" and improve clinical outcomes in these patients. (Gyeongsang National University Hospital Registry [GNUH]; NCT04650529).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.