Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40910803›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2026

Preliminary evaluation of pectoralis major fascia use in robotic nipple sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with gel implant: a retrospective comparative cohort study.

Kuo Chen, Pengwei Lu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kuo ChenDepartment of Breast surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, P.R. China.ORCID 0000-0003-0095-8545

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo demonstrate that the feasibility of using the da Vinci robotic XI surgical system for breast reconstruction with pectoralis major fascia instead of latissimus dorsi flaps.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 33 female patients with breast cancer who were treated with robotic nipple sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with gel implant (RNSMIBR) between September 2022 and June 2024 and met the selection criteria. The surgical techniques employed included the use of a latissimus dorsi muscle flap (LDMF) in seven cases (Group A), a LDMF without skin island in nine cases (Group B) and a pectoralis major fascia in 17 cases (Group C). The following data recorded: age, indication, body mass index, pathological type, treatment plan, operative time, complications, and postoperative aesthetic results.

resultsThe time for unilateral RNSMIBR was (288.57 ± 108.68) minutes in group A, (272.22 ± 39.38) minutes in group B, and (88.53 ± 14.93) minutes in group C. In Group C, three patients erythematous flaps, and three patients experienced implant loss due to infection. The remaining patients expressed satisfaction with the aesthetic outcome of the procedure.

conclusionsThe utilization of the pectoralis major fascia in lieu of the latissimus dorsi flap for RNSMIBR results in superior aesthetic outcomes and circumvents the potential injury to muscle tissue. Nevertheless, further investigation is required to ascertain the safety of this approach.

Indexed as

Breast ImplantsBreast NeoplasmsFasciaMammaplastyMastectomyMastectomy, SubcutaneousPectoralis MusclesRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNipplesOperative TimePatient SatisfactionRetrospective Studiesbreast reconstructiongel implantlatissimus dorsi muscle flappectoralis major fasciarobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID40910803
PMCPMC12825566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.