ArticleUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2025
Is endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography a reliable procedure in advanced age? A single tertiary center experience.
Article in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to determine the reliability and efficacy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in elderly patients compared with younger patients.
methodsIn this retrospective study, ERCP procedures performed in our endoscopy unit between December 2020 and October 2024 were reviewed. Elderly patients aged ≥80 years (AA group) and younger patients aged <65 years (control group) were included. Their demographics, comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, ERCP indications, procedural success, and complications were compared.
resultsThere were significant differences in ASA scores, comorbidities, and the use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs between the groups (p<0.05, p<0.01, and p<0.05, respectively). Juxtapapillary diverticula were more common in the AA group than in the control group (21% vs. 5.1%, p<0.01). Regarding indications, choledocholithiasis and obstructive jaundice were the most common in both groups (p=0.456 and p=0.064, respectively). The rate of cannulation success was not significantly different between the groups (p=0.956). Sphincterotomy and stone extraction with balloon or basket were the most frequent interventions in both groups (p=0.22 and p=0.563, respectively). Postprocedural pancreatitis was significantly more common in the control group than in the AA group (p=0.041). No significant differences were found in other complications, including bleeding, perforation, infection, basket impaction, and cardiopulmonary events between the groups (p=0.436, p=0.354, p=0.958, p=0.254, and p=0.289, respectively).
conclusionTherapeutic ERCP procedures can be performed safely and efficiently in elderly patients, as their outcomes are comparable to those observed in younger patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.