ArticleUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2025
Management of abdominal gunshot injuries: Surgical intervention or conservative follow-up? A single-center experience.
Article in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to retrospectively evaluate treatment approaches and clinical outcomes in patients with penetrating abdominal trauma caused by gunshot injuries-one of the most complex and controversial areas in trauma surgery.
methodsA total of 101 patients diagnosed and treated for penetrating abdominal trauma due to gunshot injuries between 2015 and 2025 were included in the study. Demographic data (age and sex); vital signs at admission to the emergency department (blood pressure, pulse, respiratory rate, body temperature); level of consciousness (Glasgow Coma Scale); hemodynamic status (stability/instability, need for fluid or inotropic support); intra-abdominal (liver, spleen, small intestine, colon, etc.) and extra-abdominal (thorax, extremities, head, etc.) organ injuries; laboratory findings (hemoglobin, leukocyte count, creatinine, pH level); treatment modality (surgical intervention or conservative management); surgical techniques used; blood and blood product transfusions; and hospital length of stay were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent surgical treatment and those managed conservatively. Factors influencing treatment decisions and variables affecting mortality were evaluated statistically.
resultsOf the patients, 83.2% were male, with a mean age of 28.3+-10.5 years. Surgical treatment was performed in 81.2% of cases, while 18.8% received conservative management. No mortality occurred in the conservatively managed group, whereas the surgically treated group had a mortality rate of 15.9%. Mortality among female patients (29.4%) was significantly higher than among males (9.5%) (p=0.026). Hemodynamic instability, intra-abdominal organ injury, presence of free air in the abdomen, and the need for blood product transfusion were associated with both the decision for surgical intervention and higher mortality. Additionally, damage control surgery and multiple organ injuries were linked to increased mortality.
conclusionManagement of abdominal trauma caused by gunshot injuries requires a multidisciplinary approach to ensure appropriate patient selection and treatment planning. In hemodynamically stable patients, selective non-operative management (SNOM) is a safe and effective option, whereas surgical intervention-particularly in cases requiring damage control surgery-is associated with higher mortality. The increased mortality rate among female patients underscores the need for closer monitoring of this subgroup and further investigation into potential additional risk factors. These findings align with current literature and provide practical guidance for clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.