ArticleOncoimmunology2025
Divergent on-target off-tumor effects by CAR T and CAR NK cells suggest different efficacy and safety of cell therapies.
Article in Oncoimmunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anti-BCMA CAR-NK Cells Reveal Enhanced Cytolytic and Secretory Responses Against Myeloma Cells.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Harnessing CAR-NK cells against multiple myeloma: current landscape and future directions.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Review
- Beyond CAR-T and oncology: broadening chimeric antigen receptor technologies across cell types and diseases.Precision clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Innovative gene engineering strategies to address tumor antigen escape in cell therapy.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Editorial: Achilles heel of CAR T-cell therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Circular RNA in hepatocellular carcinoma: emerging therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CAR-based cell therapies have shown clinical success in treating various cancers, with CAR T cell therapies entering the clinical route and CAR NK cell therapies being evaluated in early-stage clinical trials. A key challenge is the presence of tumor-associated antigens on healthy cells, risking on-target off-tumor toxicities. Our comparative analysis of CAR T and CAR NK cells targeting the multiple myeloma-associated antigens BCMA, SLAMF7, and CD38 revealed that antigen density on target cells significantly modulates CAR NK cell activation and cytotoxicity. The cytotoxic potential of CAR NK cells was comparable to that of CAR T cells when targeting BCMA and CD38, but notable differences were observed in SLAMF7-directed CAR cells. While CAR sensitivity was similar in both cell types, CAR NK cell activity was balanced by inhibitory receptors like KIRs and NKG2A. This balance allows effective tumor control while potentially reducing on-target off-tumor effects on healthy cells with low antigen expression. Consequently, CAR NK cells offer greater flexibility in target antigen selection, potentially expanding the range of targetable antigens for cancer immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.