ArticleBiology of reproduction2025
Imaging transzonal projections in the cumulus-oocyte complexes: challenges and solutions†.
Article in Biology of reproduction, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in bovine oocyte in vitro maturation: mechanisms and strategies.Veterinary research communications · 2026Review
- Intercellular cyclic nucleotide dynamics mediate oocyte meiosis in mammalian preovulatory follicles.Current topics in developmental biology · 2026Review
- Prediction of high-quality human oocytes and embryos through the analysis of gene expression in cumulus cells.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep three-dimensional imaging of oocytes shows several difficulties. Their large size and spherical shape cause depth-dependent artefactual shadow in the middle, resulting from refractive index mismatches induced by turbid organelles and lipid droplets. These mismatches lead to optical aberrations, increasing the laser spot size at the confocal pinhole plan and causing significant attenuation of fluorescence intensity, making it difficult to clearly image fine structures such as the transzonal projections (TZPs) connecting cumulus cells and the oocyte. To overcome these challenges, various methods of sample preparation and confocal imagery settings were compared. To clearly show the depth limitation, a clearing protocol was used to image entire fixed embryos. As expected, limiting diffraction, namely, by removing lipid droplets and harmonizing extra- and intracellular media, resulted in more uniform staining and distribution, compared to uncleared specimens. The density of the cumulus cloud and fixation protocols were shown to have a profound impact on image quality. Gentle partial stripping and low fixation reduced noise in imagery, while permeabilization with Triton enhanced antibody penetration, resulting in efficient protein labeling with the zona pellucida-enclosed TZPs. Control samples were employed to exemplify unspecific and specific signals to determine optimal confocal settings. Careful consideration of confocal parameters was shown to be crucial for well-adjusted imagery. Moreover, the choice of mounting medium and slide assembly impacts the shape and resolution of the specimen. These findings provide valuable insights into challenges associated with cumulus-oocyte complex imaging, offering solutions for optimizing sample preparation and image quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.