Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40910504›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2025

Fluorescence Quenching as a Diagnostic Tool for Prediction Reliability Assessment and Anomaly Detection in EEM-Based Water Quality Monitoring.

Yongmin Hu, Céline Jacquin, Eberhard Morgenroth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yongmin HuEawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Céline JacquinEawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Eberhard MorgenrothEawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1217-269X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Excitation-emission matrix (EEM) spectroscopy offers rapid and informative water monitoring, but its reliability is limited by chemical composition variability, which disrupts the relationship between fluorescence signals and contaminant concentrations. Recognizing this limitation, the lack of a robust and physically interpretable tool for assessing prediction reliability has become a critical bottleneck. In this work, the composition and photophysical inconsistencies among fluorescent compounds underlying the same fluorophore signal were identified as key sources of predictive inaccuracy. To detect these inconsistencies, fluorescence quenching was incorporated into EEM analysis with parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC). Apparent

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringWater QualityFluorescenceReproducibility of ResultsSpectrometry, FluorescenceWater Pollutants, ChemicalWater Pollutants, ChemicalEEMfluorescence quenchingoutlier detectionwater quality monitoring

Identifiers

PMID40910504
PMCPMC12444986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.