Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40910502›Full record

ArticleIET systems biology

Cascade Aggregation Network for Accurate Polyp Segmentation.

Yanru Jia, Yu Zeng, Huaping Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IET systems biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yanru JiaSchool of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence, Xinyang University, Xinyang, China.
Yu ZengSchool of Computer and Information Techonology, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang, China.
Huaping GuoSchool of Computer and Information Techonology, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6585-1805

Funding

Research Project on the Curriculum Reform of Teacher Education in Henan Province 2025-JSJYZD-052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate polyp segmentation is crucial for computer-aided diagnosis and early detection of colorectal cancer. Whereas feature pyramid network (FPN) and its variants are widely used in polyp segmentation, inherent limitations existing in FPN include: (1) repeated upsampling degrades fine details, reducing small polyp segmentation accuracy and (2) naive feature fusion (e.g., summation) inadequately captures global context, limiting performance on complex structures. To address limitations, we propose a cascaded aggregation network (CANet) that systematically integrates multi-level features for refined representation. CANet adopts PVT transformer as the backbone to extract robust multi-level representations and introduces a cascade aggregation module (CAM) that enriches semantic features without sacrificing spatial details. CAM adopts a top-down enhancement pathway, where high-level features progressively guide the fusion of multiscale information, enhancing semantic representation while preserving spatial details. CANet further integrates a multiscale context-aware module (MCAM) and a residual-based fusion module (RFM). MCAM applies parallel convolutions with diverse kernel sizes and dilation rates to low-level features, enabling fine-grained multiscale extraction of local details and enhancing scene understanding. RFM fuses these local features with high-level semantics from CAM, enabling effective cross-level integration. Experiments show that CANet outperforms SOTA methods in in- and out-of-distribution tests.

Indexed as

Colonic PolypsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsColorectal NeoplasmsHumanscascade aggregationmultiscale context awarepolyp segmentation

Identifiers

PMID40910502
PMCPMC12412043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.