ReviewEpilepsia2025
A critical review of high-frequency activity for functional mapping in SEEG.
Review in Epilepsia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) in neurosurgery: A critical appraisal of established practices, ongoing controversies, and future trajectories.Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mapping functional brain networks is a critical component of stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) evaluations. Although direct cortical stimulation (DCS) is the clinical gold standard, it has important limitations-particularly in mapping distributed, complex functions such as language and memory, where deficits may still occur despite preservation of DCS-positive sites, impacting quality of life. More broadly, there is increasing emphasis on preserving cognitive function in epilepsy surgery. The growing use of minimally invasive treatments-such as laser interstitial thermal therapy and radiofrequency thermocoagulation-reflects this shift. This trend highlights a need for adjunctive mapping techniques that provide anatomically precise and clinically relevant information about cortical functions, complementing existing mapping methods. Task-induced high-frequency activity (HFA), broadly defined as neural activity above 30 Hz, reflects localized cortical processing and has emerged as a physiologically plausible signal for functional mapping. As an activation-based technique, HFA may complement DCS by providing additional information about cortical function to inform surgical planning and outcome prediction. Despite growing interest, clinical uptake of HFA mapping in SEEG remains limited. This likely reflects methodological heterogeneity across published studies, lack of standardized analysis pipelines, and limited validation through outcome-linked research. Together, these challenges create uncertainty around the clinical utility of HFA. In this narrative review, we describe the neurophysiological basis of HFA, review key mapping findings across functional domains, outline practical requirements for clinical implementation, and examine major barriers to clinical translation. In doing so, we aim to provide clarity on the current evidence base and identify opportunities for future research that may support the integration of HFA mapping into clinical workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.