Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40910467›Full record

ReviewEpilepsia2025

A critical review of high-frequency activity for functional mapping in SEEG.

Parveen Sagar, Matt Hudson, Genevieve Rayner, Terence J O'Brien, Joshua Laing, Andrew Neal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epilepsia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Parveen SagarDepartment of Neuroscience, The School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8191-5733
Matt HudsonDepartment of Neuroscience, The School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5016-735X
Genevieve RaynerDepartment of Neuroscience, The School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0747-3877
Terence J O'BrienDepartment of Neuroscience, The School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7198-8621
Joshua LaingDepartment of Neuroscience, The School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8627-0690
Andrew NealDepartment of Neuroscience, The School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9251-5471

Funding

Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care - Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF)Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) ScholarshipDepartment of DefenceNational Health and Medical Research Council APP1176426National Health and Medical Research Council APP2008737National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mapping functional brain networks is a critical component of stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) evaluations. Although direct cortical stimulation (DCS) is the clinical gold standard, it has important limitations-particularly in mapping distributed, complex functions such as language and memory, where deficits may still occur despite preservation of DCS-positive sites, impacting quality of life. More broadly, there is increasing emphasis on preserving cognitive function in epilepsy surgery. The growing use of minimally invasive treatments-such as laser interstitial thermal therapy and radiofrequency thermocoagulation-reflects this shift. This trend highlights a need for adjunctive mapping techniques that provide anatomically precise and clinically relevant information about cortical functions, complementing existing mapping methods. Task-induced high-frequency activity (HFA), broadly defined as neural activity above 30 Hz, reflects localized cortical processing and has emerged as a physiologically plausible signal for functional mapping. As an activation-based technique, HFA may complement DCS by providing additional information about cortical function to inform surgical planning and outcome prediction. Despite growing interest, clinical uptake of HFA mapping in SEEG remains limited. This likely reflects methodological heterogeneity across published studies, lack of standardized analysis pipelines, and limited validation through outcome-linked research. Together, these challenges create uncertainty around the clinical utility of HFA. In this narrative review, we describe the neurophysiological basis of HFA, review key mapping findings across functional domains, outline practical requirements for clinical implementation, and examine major barriers to clinical translation. In doing so, we aim to provide clarity on the current evidence base and identify opportunities for future research that may support the integration of HFA mapping into clinical workflows.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingCerebral CortexElectroencephalographyEpilepsyStereotaxic TechniquesHumansdirect cortical stimulationepilepsy surgeryfunctional mappinghigh‐frequency activitypresurgical evaluationstereo‐EEG

Identifiers

PMID40910467
PMCPMC12779333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.