Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40910451›Full record

Trial reportTrends in hearing

Rapid Brain Adaptation to Hearing Amplification: A Randomized Crossover Trial of Personal Sound Amplification Products.

Maxime Perron, Andrew Dimitrijevic, Claude Alain

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05076045 (Immediate Effects of Personal Sound Amplification Products on Speech Processing), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05076045 nacompletednot on this map

Immediate Effects of Personal Sound Amplification Products on Speech Processing

TypeinterventionalSponsorRotman Research Institute at BaycrestRan2022 to 2022Enrolled32ConditionsHearing Loss, Age-RelatedArmsPersonal sound amplification products
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maxime PerronDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7015-5858
Andrew DimitrijevicDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1170-3484
Claude AlainDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4459-1538

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding speech in noise is a common challenge for older adults, often requiring increased listening effort that can deplete cognitive resources and impair higher-order functions. Hearing aids are the gold standard intervention for hearing loss, but cost and accessibility barriers have driven interest in alternatives such as Personal Sound Amplification Products (PSAPs). While PSAPs are not medical devices, they may help reduce listening effort in certain contexts, though supporting evidence remains limited. This study examined the short-term effects of bilateral PSAP use on listening effort using self-report measures and electroencephalography (EEG) recordings of alpha-band activity (8-12 Hz) in older adults with and without hearing loss. Twenty-five participants aged 60 to 87 years completed a hearing assessment and a phonological discrimination task under three signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) conditions during two counterbalanced sessions (unaided and aided). Results showed that PSAPs significantly reduced self-reported effort. Alpha activity in the left parietotemporal regions showed event-related desynchronization (ERD) during the task, reflecting brain engagement in response to speech in noise. In the unaided condition, alpha ERD weakened as SNR decreased, with activity approaching baseline. PSAP use moderated this effect, maintaining stronger ERD under the most challenging SNR condition. Reduced alpha ERD was associated with greater self-reported effort, suggesting neural and subjective measures reflect related dimensions of listening demand. These results suggest that even brief PSAP use can reduce perceived and neural markers of listening effort. While not a replacement for hearing aids, PSAPs may offer a means for easing cognitive load during effortful listening. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05076045, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05076045.

Indexed as

BrainCorrection of Hearing ImpairmentHearing AidsHearing LossPersons with Hearing DisabilitiesSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdaptation, PhysiologicalAgedAged, 80 and overAlpha RhythmCross-Over StudiesElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMalealpha powerhearing losslistening effortpersonal sound amplification products

Identifiers

PMID40910451
PMCPMC12413528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.