Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40910432›Full record

ArticlePsychometrika2025

Enhancing Empathic Accuracy: Penalized Functional Alignment Method to Correct Temporal Misalignment in Real-Time Emotional Perception.

Linh H Nghiem, Jing Cao, Chrystyna D Kouros, Chul Moon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychometrika, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Linh H NghiemSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, https://ror.org/0384j8v12University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jing CaoDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, https://ror.org/042tdr378Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, USA.
Chrystyna D KourosDepartment of Psychology, https://ror.org/042tdr378Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, USA.
Chul MoonDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, https://ror.org/042tdr378Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2892-5449

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Empathic accuracy (EA) is the ability to accurately understand another person's thoughts and feelings, which is crucial for social and psychological interactions. Traditionally, EA is assessed by comparing a perceiver's moment-to-moment ratings of a target's emotional state with the target's own self-reported ratings at corresponding time points. However, misalignments between these two sequences are common due to the complexity of emotional interpretation and individual differences in behavioral responses. Conventional methods often ignore or oversimplify these misalignments, for instance by assuming a fixed time lag, which can introduce bias into EA estimates. To address this, we propose a novel alignment approach that captures a wide range of misalignment patterns. Our method leverages the square-root velocity framework to decompose emotional rating trajectories into amplitude and phase components. To ensure realistic alignment, we introduce a regularization constraint that limits temporal shifts to ranges consistent with human perceptual capabilities. This alignment is efficiently implemented using a constrained dynamic programming algorithm. We validate our method through simulations and real-world applications involving video and music datasets, demonstrating its superior performance over traditional techniques.

Indexed as

EmotionsEmpathyPsychometricsAlgorithmsHumansMusiccognitive studyfunctional data analysisregularizationsquare root velocity functionwarping function

Identifiers

PMID40910432
PMCPMC12660001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.