Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40910427›Full record

SynthesisDevelopmental science2025

Meta-Analytic Review of the Short-Term Effects of Media Exposure on Children's Attention and Executive Functions.

Ashley E Hinten, Damian Scarf, Kana Imuta

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Developmental science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ashley E HintenDepartment of Psychology, University of Otago, Aotearoa, New Zealand.
Damian ScarfDepartment of Psychology, University of Otago, Aotearoa, New Zealand.
Kana ImutaSchool of Psychology, University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6513-6254

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are long-held concerns regarding the impact of screen media on children's cognitive development. In particular, fast pace and fantastical events have been theorized to deplete children's cognitive resources, leading to reductions in their attention and executive functions (EF). To date, however, empirical tests of short-term effects of media pace and fantasy on children's cognition have yielded mixed findings. In the present study, we conducted meta-analytic syntheses of previous findings on the impact of pace (19 studies involving 141 effect sizes based on 1431 1.5- to 10-year-olds) and fantasy (16 studies involving 121 effect sizes based on 1297 1.5- to 6-year-olds) on children's attention and EF immediately after media exposure. Overall, our findings revealed that media pace does not affect children's cognition (d = -0.123, 95% CI [-0.331, 0.086], p = 0.23). In contrast, media fantasy was found to have a negative effect, wherein children who watched fantastical media compared to realistic media performed worse on attention and EF tasks immediately post-viewing (d = -0.244, 95% CI [-0.442, -0.046], p = 0.02). The large heterogeneity in effects for both pace (95% PI [-1.100, 0.854]) and fantasy (95% PI [-1.120, 0.632]), however, points to the complexity in conditions under which media exposure differentially impacts children's cognition-in some cases, negatively, in others positively, or not at all. Of the moderators tested, our findings point to the influence of facet of cognition examined (attention, cognitive flexibility, higher order EF, inhibitory control, working memory) on the strength of short-term media exposure effect. SUMMARY: Meta-analytic synthesis of previous findings from 19 studies showed no consistent pattern of short-term impact of media pace on children's attention and executive functions. Meta-analysis involving 16 studies that examined the effect of media fantasy revealed children's cognitive performance is worse immediately after viewing fantastical compared to realistic media. The influence of media exposure on children's post-viewing cognitive performance observed in a study must be considered in light of the study's methodology. Our findings suggest the complexity of contextual factors that interact to determine how screen media can both promote and hinder children's development.

Indexed as

AttentionChild DevelopmentCognitionExecutive FunctionFantasyChildChild, PreschoolHumansMedia Exposureattentionchildrenexecutive function (EF)fantasypacescreen mediatelevision (TV)

Identifiers

PMID40910427
PMCPMC12412071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.