Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40910424›Full record

ArticlePalliative & supportive care2025

Caring for carers of people with advanced cancer at hospital discharge (CARENET): A single-arm open label feasibility trial.

Celia Marston, Marc L'etang, Jennifer Philip, Deidre D Morgan, Lara Edbrooke, Sungwon Chang, Meera R Agar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative & supportive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Celia MarstonDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6400-804X
Marc L'etangDepartment of Social Work, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jennifer PhilipDepartment of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Deidre D MorganResearch Centre for Palliative Care, Death and Dying (RePaDD), Palliative and End-of-Life Care, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
Lara EdbrookeDepartment of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Sungwon ChangIMPACCT, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Meera R AgarIMPACCT, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6756-6119

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCarers are critical to support discharge home from hospital at end of life yet remain under-represented in health service initiatives to assist this transition. A carer-focused intervention embedded into practice may facilitate hospital discharge. This open-labeled, single-arm phase 2 study aimed to determine the feasibility of (1) delivering a multi-staged intervention (CARENET) to carers of advanced cancer patients in a hospital setting and (2) the study design to inform a phase 3 trial.

methodsCARENET, delivered before and after discharge to address carer support needs, was tested in an Australian specialist cancer hospital. Eligible participants included carers of advanced cancer inpatients with planned discharge home. The primary outcome was intervention and trial feasibility (recruitment and adherence). Secondary outcomes were eligibility and effects of intervention on outcomes including carer preparedness.

resultsOf the 382 potential patient-carer dyads, 25 were recruited within required time frames. The intervention adherence outcome feasibility threshold of 80% of carer participants completing all 3 core components of CARENET was not achieved (60% completion). Trends in improvement in overall carer levels of preparedness were observed from baseline to discharge home ( SIGNIFICANCE OF

resultsDelivering all elements of the CARENET intervention to address carers' needs in the discharge planning context was not feasible. However, some elements were feasible, including identifying and responding to carer need, whilst completing elements after discharge were less feasible. Findings can be explained by problems with adherence, eligibility, and clinician barriers to fitting a multi-staged carer intervention into an acute healthcare setting. Future research should test a more adaptable intervention and delivery model that is accessible to all carers across and compatible with acute care settings.

Indexed as

CaregiversNeoplasmsPatient DischargeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAdvanced cancercarersdischarge planningpalliative care

Identifiers

PMID40910424
PMCPMC13166733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.