ArticleThe Canadian journal of urology2025
Simple prostatectomy followed by radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a novel treatment pathway for men with marked prostatomegaly and prostate cancer: a series of cases.
Article in The Canadian journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRadical prostatectomy has long been the treatment of choice for men with clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) in those with concurrent significant lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). For men who meet this description with marked prostatomegaly, we present a multi-institutional proof of concept study describing an alternative pathway of robotic simple prostatectomy (RASP) followed by external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for the treatment of clinically significant prostate cancer.
methodsA retrospective study was performed of 17 patients with PCa who underwent RASP followed by EBRT at two institutions from 2015-2023. Demographic, peri-operative, and post-radiation treatment functional outcomes are reported.
resultsNo postoperative or post-EBRT complications were reported for any of the 17 patients who underwent RASP followed by EBRT during a median follow-up time of 12 months. The median time from RASP to EBRT was 9 months. Median prostate size was 135 g (IQR 110-165). 13 (76.5%) patients received a pre-EBRT rectal spacer. Median IPSS score preoperatively improved at 90 days post-RASP (13.5 vs. 2.5; IQR 10.8-15.2), and this benefit was sustained post-EBRT with a median IPSS at 3 vs. 12 months (4 vs. 0; IQR 0-5). There was no statistically significant difference between postoperative IPSS and post-EBRT IPSS at 3 (p = 0.677) or 12 (p = 0.627) months. In all 14 patients with localized disease and PSA data, none had recurrence during the study period.
conclusionsA subset of patients with clinically significant prostate cancer have marked prostatomegaly and LUTS. We report an alternative treatment approach for patients unwilling to undergo radical prostatectomy. We found robotic simple prostatectomy followed by definitive radiation to be feasible and safe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40910328What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.