ArticleThe Canadian journal of urology2025
National survey of radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy strategies with PSMA-PET/CT integration in intermediate-risk prostate cancer: TROD 09-007 study.
Article in The Canadian journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Kinetics of prostate volume reduction under hormonal treatment: Timing and impact on external beam radiotherapy - A PRISMA-Compliant systematic review.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntermediate-risk prostate cancer (IR-PC) represents a heterogeneous group requiring nuanced treatment approaches, and recent advancements in radiotherapy (RT), androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), and prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) imaging have prompted growing interest in personalized, risk-adapted management strategies. This study by the Turkish Society for Radiation Oncology aims to examine radiation oncologists' practices in managing IR-PC, focusing on RT and imaging modalities to identify trends for personalized treatments.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among Turkish radiation oncologists treating at least 50 prostate cancer (PC) cases annually. The 22-item questionnaire covered IR-PC management aspects such as risk stratification, imaging preferences, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) use and duration, RT techniques, and treatment combinations. Anonymous responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
resultsThirty radiation oncologists participated, 57% with over 20 years of experience. The median annual number of PC cases treated was 130. For risk stratification, 43% followed the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, while 30% used the D'Amico classification. Imaging preferences revealed 47% favored PSMA-PET/CT. External beam RT was universally preferred, with 60% adopting ultra-hypofractionation. ADT was used by 97%, with 73% recommending it for unfavorable IR-PC cases. Short-term ADT (4-6 months) was the standard, administered concurrently with RT by 57%. Cardiovascular status influenced decisions for 97% of respondents, while 37% also considered patient age, preferences, and sexual health.
conclusionsThis national survey demonstrates a shift toward personalized care in intermediate-risk prostate cancer in Turkey, marked by selective PSMA-PET/CT use, tailored ADT, and evolving radiotherapy practices. The findings underscore the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration-particularly between urologists and radiation oncologists-to optimize imaging integration and treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40910322What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.