ArticleChemical senses2025
Olfactory training enhances semantic verbal fluency in healthy older adults, but only for individuals with low baseline performance.
Article in Chemical senses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Olfactory training (OT), a structured exposure to odors, is commonly used by otorhinolaryngologists to treat olfactory dysfunction. However, OT has been shown to improve cognition of people with cognitive or olfactory impairments and slow the age-related cognitive decline. This study investigated whether OT could enhance cognitive functions in older adults with an intact sense of smell, compared with younger adults. We hypothesized that OT would improve semantic verbal fluency and working memory in the experimental group, with no significant changes in the placebo group (PG). The final sample comprised 184 participants aged 24 to 94 years (Mage = 51.84 ± 23.25 years), including 83 young adults (53% women, Mage = 26.71 ± 2.62 years) and 101 older adults (88% women, Mage = 72.49 ± 5.40 years). For the semantic verbal fluency task, they listed as many items as possible within one of 2 semantic categories: (i) grocery products or (ii) fragrant items, within a 60-s time limit. To measure working memory, participants completed a digit span task where they repeated sequences of digits aloud. In older adults performing OT, it led to a marginal increase in semantic verbal fluency, regardless of semantic category, while no significant changes were observed in the older PG or in young adults. This effect was mainly driven by individuals with lower scores at baseline. Our findings suggest that OT can benefit semantic verbal fluency in the healthy geriatric population with lower baseline scores, but these results urge similar testing in clinical groups with compromised verbal functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.