ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2026
Interpretable LLM-Based Detection of Loose Associations Using Synthetic Speech Data in Early Psychosis.
Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using AI to Detect Psychosis Relapse: Scoping Review.JMIR mental health · 2026Article
- Tracking the dynamic breakdown of contextual coherence in schizophrenia using language models.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- The Use of Artificial Intelligence for Personalized Treatment in Psychiatry.Current psychiatry reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and hypothesisLoose Associations (LA) in speech are key indicators of psychosis risk, notably in schizophrenia. Current detection methods are hampered by subjective evaluation, small samples, and poor generalizability. We hypothesize that combining Large Language Models (LLMs) with machine learning techniques could enhance objective identification of LA through improved semantic and probabilistic linguistic measures. STUDY
designWe propose a novel and reproducible workflow for generating synthetic conversational instances of LA using LLMs, guided by linguistic theory and validated through clinical expert review. This synthetic dataset forms the basis for model training and is complemented by an independently collected dataset for evaluation. Features extracted included traditional clause similarity measures alongside novel surprisal metrics quantifying semantic coherence and unexpected lexical shifts. A parsimonious and interpretable Light Gradient Boosting Machine model was trained using only four features. STUDY
resultsThe final model achieved high accuracy (83.46%; 95% CI: 82.96-83.95) on the synthetic dataset and robust performance on an independent set (82.36%; 95% CI: 81.94-82.78, AUC: 0.868). Our model outperformed baselines, including similarity-only models and prior thought disorder detection workflows. SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis confirmed the interpretability of the selected features, highlighting semantic coherence and word surprisal as key discriminators.
conclusionsOur approach demonstrates that LLM-derived linguistic features substantially enhance the objective, scalable detection of LA. The resulting model achieves high accuracy with minimal complexity, facilitating clinical applicability and interpretability. Future research should integrate additional lexical and contextual dimensions to further refine the identification of thought disorders, ultimately supporting early psychosis intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.