Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40910283›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2026

Interpretable LLM-Based Detection of Loose Associations Using Synthetic Speech Data in Early Psychosis.

Enrique Gutiérrez, Carlos Quesada, Emily DeFraites, Danielle J Harper, Amar D Mandavia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Enrique GutiérrezDepartamento de Matemática Aplicada a las Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería de Sistemas Informáticos, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, C. de Alan Turing, s/n, Campus Sur, Madrid 28031, Madrid, España.
Carlos QuesadaDepartamento de Matemática Aplicada a las Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería de Sistemas Informáticos, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, C. de Alan Turing, s/n, Campus Sur, Madrid 28031, Madrid, España.
Emily DeFraitesMIT linQ, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States.
Danielle J HarperMIT linQ, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States.
Amar D MandaviaMIT linQ, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7166-7692

Funding

Clinical Sciences Research and Development Service (CSR&D) SPR-002-25FJames A. Haley Veterans' HospitalMassachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) linQ Catalyst ProgramMIT Institute for Medical Engineering and Science (IMES)United States Department of Veterans AffairsVeterans Healthcare Innovation Ecosystem (VHA iNET) projects "Seed_1845" and "Boston_Mandavia_87"
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and hypothesisLoose Associations (LA) in speech are key indicators of psychosis risk, notably in schizophrenia. Current detection methods are hampered by subjective evaluation, small samples, and poor generalizability. We hypothesize that combining Large Language Models (LLMs) with machine learning techniques could enhance objective identification of LA through improved semantic and probabilistic linguistic measures. STUDY

designWe propose a novel and reproducible workflow for generating synthetic conversational instances of LA using LLMs, guided by linguistic theory and validated through clinical expert review. This synthetic dataset forms the basis for model training and is complemented by an independently collected dataset for evaluation. Features extracted included traditional clause similarity measures alongside novel surprisal metrics quantifying semantic coherence and unexpected lexical shifts. A parsimonious and interpretable Light Gradient Boosting Machine model was trained using only four features. STUDY

resultsThe final model achieved high accuracy (83.46%; 95% CI: 82.96-83.95) on the synthetic dataset and robust performance on an independent set (82.36%; 95% CI: 81.94-82.78, AUC: 0.868). Our model outperformed baselines, including similarity-only models and prior thought disorder detection workflows. SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis confirmed the interpretability of the selected features, highlighting semantic coherence and word surprisal as key discriminators.

conclusionsOur approach demonstrates that LLM-derived linguistic features substantially enhance the objective, scalable detection of LA. The resulting model achieves high accuracy with minimal complexity, facilitating clinical applicability and interpretability. Future research should integrate additional lexical and contextual dimensions to further refine the identification of thought disorders, ultimately supporting early psychosis intervention.

Indexed as

Large Language ModelsMachine LearningPsychotic DisordersSchizophreniaSpeechHumansdata augmentationearly psychosisformal thought disorderinterpretabilitylanguage thought disordersLarge Language Modelsloose associationsmachine learningschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID40910283
PMCPMC13391620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.