ArticleThe clinical teacher2025
Exploring Virtual Reality as a Tool for Enhancing Teaching and Learning Anatomy to Medical Students: A Feasibility and Acceptability Study.
Article in The clinical teacher, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- 360° Video-Based Virtual Reality for Preparing Medical Students for Body Donor Dissection: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR formative research · 2026Trial
- Finite-Element Computer Modeling of Spatial Displacement of the Pterygoid Venous Plexus During Mandibular Movements.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Using virtual reality to support the transition from preclinical to clinical training in paediatric dentistry.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Exploring cognitive load in anatomy education: a study of 3D virtual reality and 2D learning environments using fNIRS.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Perceived Impact of Virtual Reality-Based Education for History-Taking and Physical Examination Skills among International Medical Graduates in Japan: A Feasible One-Group Pretest-Posttest Study.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVirtual reality (VR) provides an immersive, interactive 3D learning environment with increasing use in medical education. It benefits surgical training and, increasingly more so in anatomy education, particularly where access to human body dissection is limited. Although VR can enhance engagement and knowledge retention, concerns remain regarding usability, feasibility and cybersickness. This study explores the acceptability of VR for anatomy learning among medical students with ongoing access to traditional anatomy laboratories. APPROACH: A qualitative cross-sectional pilot study was conducted with 38 medical students at the ASSERT Simulation Centre, University College Cork. Participants took part in a guided VR session using human anatomy software. Afterwards, they completed an online survey assessing ease of use, enjoyment, immersion, educational usefulness, interaction, understanding, intention for future use and cybersickness. The survey was adapted from two validated questionnaires. Feature engineering combined related items into eight dimensions for streamlined analysis and visualisation. EVALUATION: Results showed high acceptance and enthusiasm for VR. All participants reported enjoying the experience, finding it educationally useful, and that it enhanced their understanding. Between 95% and 98% found VR easy to use, immersive and reported ease in interacting with 3D objects. Although 8% experienced cybersickness, all expressed interest in future VR-based education. Potential novelty bias must also be considered. VR is a feasible and well-accepted tool for anatomy education, even among students with ongoing access to anatomy dissection facilities. With minimal cybersickness and high enjoyment, engagement and immersion, VR shows strong potential as a complementary educational method. Further research should explore long-term learning outcomes in terms of knowledge retention and clinical implementation strategies within educational institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.