ArticleThe New phytologist2025
Inhibition of rhizobial cheaters by the host Medicago truncatula involves repression of symbiotic functions and induction of defense.
Article in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transitive interactions among rhizobia determine their symbiotic fitness.ISME communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In symbiotic plant-microbe interactions, the host invests considerable amounts of resources in the microbial partner. If the microbe does not reciprocate with a comparable symbiotic benefit, it is regarded as a cheater. The host responds to cheaters with negative feedback mechanisms (sanctions) to prevent fitness deficits resulting from being exploited. We study sanctioning in the symbiosis between Medicago truncatula and the nitrogen-fixing rhizobium Sinorhizobium meliloti. We manipulated the exchange of resources between the partners in three ways: by using mutant rhizobia defective in nitrogenase; replacing nitrogen in the atmosphere with argon gas; and supplying rich nitrogen fertilizer to the host. We follow the consequences of simulated cheating by examining the metabolome and proteome of both partners. We find that sanctioning occurs at multiple levels. In particular, we observe repression of essential symbiotic functions and changes in central metabolism that are likely to be relevant for microbial fitness and that could therefore contribute to sanctioning. In addition, sanctioning triggers a broad panel of defense markers. A thorough understanding of the multilevel phenomenon of sanctioning will be essential for its genetic dissection and for the breeding of elite legume crops with efficient symbiosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.