ArticleHealth science reports2025
Cancer Patients Circadian Rhythm Assessment Based on Morningness-Eveningness Preference: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cancer Patients Circadian Rhythm Assessment Based on Morningness-Eveningness Preference: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: The circadian rhythm regulates various physiological processes, including sleep-wake cycle, cell division and cancer development. This study aimed to investigate circadian rhythm patterns in cancer patients. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 150 cancer patients admitted to the hospital enrolled the study during the fall of 2022. The demographic characteristics of patients were collected using a checklist. Patients also completed a morningness-eveningness questionnaire (MEQ). Utilizing Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Fisher's exact test, circadian rhythm types with continuous and categorical variables were compared. Results: The mean age of the study's participants was 49.83 ± 14.53 years. A total of 82.7% ( Conclusion: According to the findings of this study, the circadian rhythm is distributed normally among the participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.