ReviewBiologics : targets & therapy2025
Enhancing Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer in Genetically Predisposed Individuals: Integrating Advanced Imaging Modalities with Emerging Biomarkers and Liquid Biopsy.
Review in Biologics : targets & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research progress on early diagnostic markers for pancreatic cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- Beyond sensitivity and specificity: Redefining the era connotation of "low-risk" in pancreatic cancer screening.World journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- DNA damage response inhibitors in pancreatic cancer: progress and challenges.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal malignancies, with a five-year survival rate rarely exceeding 10%. Due to its asymptomatic onset, it is frequently diagnosed at an advanced and often inoperable stage. This review assesses current strategies for early detection, including genomic testing, advanced imaging technologies, and biomarker-based platforms, with a focus on their clinical utility and integration into surveillance protocols. Methods: This narrative review synthesizes findings from published literature on germline genetic testing (GGT), imaging modalities such as endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the latest advancements in biomarker discovery and molecular diagnostics for early pancreatic cancer detection. International guidelines and emerging evidence were assessed to explore their clinical implementation and challenges. Results: Although EUS and MRI show promise for detecting early pancreatic lesions, both require specialized expertise and are limited by accessibility and cost. Emerging blood-based biomarkers and molecular platforms, however, may offer a more scalable, non-invasive alternative for detecting pancreatic cancer at earlier, treatable stages. Conclusion: Early detection of pancreatic cancer is pivotal to improving survival outcomes. While imaging techniques and genetic screening have enhanced risk stratification and early diagnosis in high-risk populations, novel biomarker and molecular testing platforms offer an accessible and scalable solution. Future efforts should focus on validating these assays in large-scale prospective cohorts and integrating them into screening protocols, particularly for individuals with genetic susceptibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.