Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40910102›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science

Efficacy and Safety of Voretigene Neparvovec in

Kaoru Fujinami, Kunihiko Akiyama, Kazushige Tsunoda, Saori Ito, Noriko Seko, Shuichi Yamamoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Clinical endpoints special session, ISCEV 2025, Utrecht.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kaoru FujinamiLaboratory of Visual Physiology, Division of Vision Research, National Institute of Sensory Organs, NHO Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Kunihiko AkiyamaDepartment of Ophthalmology, NHO Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazushige TsunodaDepartment of Ophthalmology, NHO Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Saori ItoNovartis Pharma KK, Tokyo, Japan.
Noriko SekoNovartis Pharma KK, Tokyo, Japan.
Shuichi YamamotoJapan Community Healthcare Organization, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We report the efficacy and safety of voretigene neparvovec (VN) as an adeno-associated viral vector-based gene therapy for Japanese patients with inherited retinal dystrophy caused by biallelic pathogenic Design: Open-label, single arm, phase III clinical trial. Participants: Four subjects were recruited based on the following criteria: (1) a clinical and molecular genetic diagnosis of Methods: All subjects received subretinal injections of VN (1.5 × 10 Main Outcome Measures: The primary efficacy end point was a change from baseline in full-field light sensitivity threshold (FST) (white light, averaged over both eyes) at days 30, 90, 180, 270, and year 1. The secondary efficacy end points included changes from baseline in VF testing by Goldmann kinetic perimetry (GP) and BCVA in the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR) unit. Safety was evaluated by adverse events (AEs), laboratory evaluations, and opthalmic examinations. Results: The mean baseline age of 4 subjects was 31.3 years (10, 17, 49, and 49 years). The homozygous pathogenic variants (c.1543C>T, p.Arg515Trp) were identified in 3 subjects. The mean (range) FST averaged over both eyes improved by -1.831 (-3.54 to -0.56) log Conclusions: Overall, these data from a phase III trial showed improvements in FST and VF and well-tolerated safety profiles of VN for 1 year, with ongoing follow-up of up to 5 years in Japanese patients with Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

ElectrophysiologyFull-field stimulus testGene therapyRPE65Voretigene neparvovec

Identifiers

PMID40910102
PMCPMC12405627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.