ArticleOphthalmology science
Focal Weakening/Thinnest Corneal Point Proximity in Normal, Subclinical, and Keratoconic Corneas Using Motion-Tracking Brillouin Microscopy.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Motion-Tracking Brillouin Microscopy for Keratoconus Suspect Identification: Comparison With Multimodal Corneal Imaging.American journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Re: Abdelmotaal et al: Artificial Intelligence-Derived Biomechanical Index for Early Corneal Ectasia Detection: Advancing Beyond Tomography.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Wavelet time-frequency analysis enhances noise-resilient quantification of corneal wave velocity and natural frequency in optical coherence elastography.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the proximity between the thinnest corneal point (TCP) and focal corneal weakening in normal, subclinical keratoconus (SKC), and manifest keratoconus (KC) eyes using motion-tracking Brillouin microscopy. Design: Prospective cross-sectional study. Participants: Ninety-five eyes from 95 patients were evaluated: 40 from bilaterally normal patients (controls), 40 from patients with SKC, and 15 from patients with manifest KC. Methods: All patients underwent Scheimpflug tomography, anterior segment OCT (AS-OCT), and custom-built motion-tracking Brillouin (MTB) imaging. Mean and minimum MTB shift values were calculated within the anterior plateau region. Euclidean distances between the TCP (identified by AS-OCT) and the minimum Brillouin shift (MTB-Min) were determined. Motion-tracking Brillouin minimum values within 10 MHz of the absolute minimum were considered equivalent (MTB-Min(e)). Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated for both metrics to determine the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. Main Outcome Measures: Distance between MTB-Min and TCP; group discrimination based on area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: No significant differences were found between groups for age, sex, KMean, or KMax. Subclinical keratoconus and KC eyes were significantly thinner than controls. Motion-tracking Brillouin minimum values were significantly lower in SKC and KC eyes compared with controls. Average distances between MTB-Min and TCP were 0.31 ± 0.16 mm (0.04-0.69 mm) in controls, 0.53 ± 0.28 mm (0.11-1.19 mm) in SKC, and 0.54 ± 0.35 mm (0.10-1.36 mm) for KC ( Conclusions: Focal corneal weakening occurs in close proximity to the thinnest corneal point in SKC. This study provides the first experimental confirmation of this relationship and demonstrates focal mechanical localization in subclinical and early KC. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.