ReviewFrontiers in psychology2025
More sustainable choices in the workplace: a systematic review of nudge theory applications.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nudge theory proposes subtle changes to the choice environment to influence behavior without restricting autonomy. This scoping review investigates the application of nudging strategies within workplace settings to promote pro-environmental behaviors among employees. Sixteen peer-reviewed empirical studies were selected using PRISMA guidelines from four major databases. The analysis examines the characteristics of the selected studies, theoretical definitions of nudging, intervention types, and observed effectiveness. Findings show a notable increase in publications from 2020 onward, reflecting growing academic and institutional interest in sustainable organizational practices. Most studies are based in high-income Western countries, particularly within the tertiary sector. A clear heterogeneity emerged in how nudging is defined, with only half of the studies explicitly referencing Thaler and Sunstein's classical framework. Others relied on broader psychological theories, such as social norms or cognitive biases, often without operational clarity. The nudges identified were classified into five categories: informational, reminders and notifications, financial incentives, non-financial incentives, and positioning and default options. Informational nudges and reminders were most commonly applied due to their low intrusiveness and implementation costs, but positioning and incentive-based strategies showed promising results in certain organizational contexts. Effectiveness was highest when nudges were paired with tangible incentives, required minimal effort, and were socially supported by leadership or peers. Conversely, interventions targeting high-cost behaviors or lacking enabling infrastructure were less successful. A lack of long-term follow-up assessments also limits conclusions about the durability of effects. This review highlights the need for consistent operational definitions, context-sensitive design, and longitudinal research. It emphasizes the importance of integrating behavioral insights into organizational structures and processes to foster environmentally responsible behaviors at work and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.