Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40910064›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2025

The needs and unmet needs for people living with dementia, caregivers and care workers in dementia health care systems: a systematic review.

Michele Sorrentino, Michelangelo Mercogliano, Claudio Fiorilla, Irene Stilo, Federica Esposito, Marcello Moccia, Luigi Lavorgna, Giuseppina Affinito, Elena Salvatore, Maria Pia Sormani and 5 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Individual Matching Support in Community Dementia Care: A Reflexive Thematic Analysis of Team Orange in Sapporo City.Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Michele Sorrentino *Department of Public Health, University "Federico II" of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Michelangelo Mercogliano *Department of Public Health, University "Federico II" of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Claudio FiorillaDepartment of Public Health, University "Federico II" of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Irene StiloDepartment of Public Health, University "Federico II" of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Federica EspositoDepartment of Public Health, University "Federico II" of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Marcello MocciaDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Luigi LavorgnaDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Giuseppina AffinitoDepartment of Public Health, University "Federico II" of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Elena SalvatoreDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Maria Pia SormaniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
Anna OdoneDepartment of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Azeem MajeedDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Fabiana RubbaDepartment of Public Health, University "Federico II" of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Maria TriassiDepartment of Public Health, University "Federico II" of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Raffaele PalladinoDepartment of Public Health, University "Federico II" of Naples, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The prevalence and costs of dementias are rising due to demographic changes. Dementia care depends largely on informal caregivers and fragmented healthcare systems that often fail to meet the needs of people with dementia. Objectives: This systematic review aims to identify unmet needs and barriers in European dementia care, providing a framework to improve health strategies. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, articles from 2013 to 2023 were screened from Embase, PsycINFO, HTA Database, and Web of Science. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used for evaluation. Results: From 3,738 articles, 47 met the inclusion criteria. Through a narrative synthesis, the review identified unmet needs and barriers among People Living with Dementia, caregivers, and healthcare workers. Psychosocial and emotional support are essential for managing stress and ensuring quality of life. Caregivers demand education about dementia care, progression, and self-care, while healthcare workers need training, and interdisciplinary teams. Cultural sensitivity is critical for addressing stigma and facilitating inclusive care for ethnic minorities. Healthcare access remains fragmented, thereby decreasing continuity of care for families. High costs, bureaucratic complexity, and geographical inequalities, particularly in rural areas can be barrier to care for People Living with Dementia and their families. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted social support services, increasing distress and uncertainty. About limitation, publication bias and geographical bias from focus on Europe were possible, potentially overlooking insights from other regions. Conclusion: There is need for public policies to enhance education, community support, and dementia awareness, with a focus on culturally sensitive care.

Indexed as

CaregiversDelivery of Health CareDementiaHealth PersonnelHealth Services Needs and DemandEuropeHealth Services AccessibilityHumansAlzheimer’s diseasecaregiverdementiahealthcare workersneedsystematic reviewunmet needs

Identifiers

PMID40910064
PMCPMC12404970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.