Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40910053›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Development of a comprehensive school anti-bullying logic model in Abu Dhabi: a multi-method participatory approach.

Alfan Al-Ketbi

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alfan Al-KetbiDepartment of Health Care Management, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bullying remains a critical issue affecting the well-being, academic performance, and long-term development of school-aged children. This study documents the participatory development of a Comprehensive School Anti-Bullying Logic Model in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (UAE). Methods: Utilizing a multi-method process consisting of stakeholders' interviews, focus group discussions (FGDs), group workshops, and a scoping review-the study sought to construct a culturally sensitive and actionable anti-bullying logic model. Results: Themes that emerged from interviews and FGDs were underreporting of bullying, the requirement of clearer policies, and a call for more support mechanisms. The logic model developed has organized components: inputs/resources, activities, outputs, outcomes, impact and assumption and external factors. This model combines global best practices with local knowledge and provides a strategic framework for efficient policy design and implementation for all schools in the Emirate. The process emphasizes the necessity of multi-stakeholder involvement in solving intricate education problems. This collaborative process led to a strategic, culturally suitable anti-bullying logic model. The model provides a blueprint for effective implementation and evaluation within and between schools in the emirate. The creation of this Abu Dhabi Comprehensive School Anti-Bullying Logic Model is a reflective and culturally appropriate approach in reducing bullying in schools. The utilization of a multi-method study and involving a broad cross-section of stakeholders has yielded a framework that is underpinned by local context and international best practice. Conclusion: This model offers a strategic roadmap for schools to effectively implement policies and programs to minimize bullying and establish a safer, more supportive learning environment. The research highlights the need for concerted effort in solving intricate problems such as bullying to ensure that solutions are practical, relevant, and sustainable.

Indexed as

BullyingSchoolsChildFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicLogicMaleUnited Arab Emiratesacademic performancelogic modelsmental healthschool-bullyingUAE

Identifiers

PMID40910053
PMCPMC12405265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.