ArticleEvolutionary applications2025
Whole-Genome Resequencing Provides Novel Insights Into the Genetic Diversity, Population Structure, and Patterns of Runs of Homozygosity in Mud Crab (
Article in Evolutionary applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Diversity and Differentiation Pattern ofBiology · 2026Article
- Genetic parameters estimation and optimization of genomic selection in mud crab (Scylla paramamosain): a case study for growth-related traits.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Whole-Genome Resequencing Provides Novel Insights Into the Genetic Diversity, Population Structure, and Patterns of Runs of Homozygosity in Mud Crab (Evolutionary applications · 2025Article
- Genome-Wide Association Studies in Japanese Quails of the FInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mud crab (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.