ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Enhancing dosimetric precision in the treatment of cancerous tumors: Gamma Index validation and Monte Carlo simulations of 6 and 12 megavoltage photon beams from Varian Medical linear accelerators.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- G4DARI: an intuitive graphical interface for Monte Carlo radiation dose calculation using GATE/GEANT4.Radiation protection dosimetry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The accuracy of dose delivery in radiotherapy is paramount to maximize tumor control while minimizing damage to surrounding healthy tissues. This study presents a comprehensive analysis of gamma index validation in the treatment of cancerous tumors using Monte Carlo simulations with GAMOS and GATE codes on a Varian medical linear accelerator. By leveraging the MC method's robust statistical capabilities, the precision of dose distributions in external radiotherapy is aimed to be enhanced. The study specifically evaluates the effects of different field sizes and percentage depth dose (PDD) to provide a thorough validation framework. Methods: The GAMOS and GATE codes were implemented to simulate dose distributions within various phantom models, including water and anthropomorphic phantoms. These simulations were conducted using a Varian linear accelerator with a 6 and 12 megavoltage photon beams. The dose distributions obtained from the simulations were then compared against those calculated by the treatment planning system (TPS) using the gamma index method with 3%/3mm criteria. Results and discussion: The results demonstrated a high degree of accuracy in the simulated dose distributions, with gamma index pass rates exceeding 94% for most configurations. The comparative analysis between GAMOS and GATE showed consistent performance, with minor deviations attributable to differences in the underlying simulation algorithms. Furthermore, the study revealed significant insights into the impact of varying field sizes on dose distribution accuracy. The PDD analysis indicated that both GAMOS and GATE could reliably reproduce the TPS-calculated dose profiles, with deviations within clinically acceptable limits. These findings underscore the potential of MC simulations to improve the accuracy and reliability of radiotherapy treatment plans. By validating the gamma index for different field sizes and PDD, this study provides a robust framework for enhancing treatment efficacy and patient safety in clinical practice. The integration of GAMOS and GATE in routine clinical workflows could lead to more precise and individualized radiotherapy treatments, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.