ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Prognostic value of the log odds of negative lymph nodes/T stage ratio (LONT) in postoperative esophageal cancer: a SEER-based study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Surgery remains the primary treatment for patients with esophageal cancer (EC), yet postoperative prognosis is often unsatisfactory. Accurate prediction of cancer-specific survival (CSS) can assist clinicians in personalized treatment planning. This study aimed to develop an interactive web-based tool to estimate CSS in patients with T1~3N0~2M0 EC after surgery, based on the log odds of negative lymph nodes/T stage ratio (LONT). Methods: A total of 2,221 patients with T1~3N0~2M0 EC were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients were randomly divided into training and testing sets. Univariate Cox regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with CSS. Cox regression and random survival forest (RSF) models were used to compare the predictive performance of LONT and N stage. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration curves. An interactive web-based tool was then constructed for individualized survival prediction. Results: Univariate analysis revealed that age, sex, T stage, N stage, chemotherapy, and LONT were significantly associated with CSS. ROC curve comparisons showed that LONT outperformed N stage in predictive accuracy, particularly for 1-year CSS. DCA and calibration curves indicated that the model had high predictive accuracy in both training and testing sets. Discussion: The developed interactive web-based tool provides effective estimation of 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS, as well as survival trends, in postoperative patients with T1~3N0~2M0 EC. This tool may aid clinical decision-making by enabling more accurate individualized prognosis prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.