Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40909960›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2025

Predictive models for chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis: a systematic review.

Yan Tao, Xiang Zeng, Hua Mao

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yan Tao *Jianyang Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital Nursing Department, Chengdu, China.
Xiang Zeng *Nursing Department, Chongqing JiangJin District Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Hua MaoJianyang Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital Nursing Department, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To critically appraise and synthesise existing risk prediction models for chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis (CIOM) in cancer patients, identifying their methodological strengths, limitations, and clinical utility to guide future model refinement. Methods: Relevant literature on CIOM risk prediction models published in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, VIP, and CBM was searched, covering the period from the inception of the databases to May 9, 2025. Researchers independently screened the literature and extracted data, utilising the Prediction Model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) to evaluate the quality of the models. Result: After deduplication, a total of 3,603 articles were identified, encompassing 8 studies that presented 11 models of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis. All 11 models reported the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, which ranged from 0.630 to 0.966. The combined AUC value of the 5 models was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.93). Five models reported calibration, 8 underwent internal validation, and only 4 underwent external validation. Age, oral hygiene, smoking history, chemotherapy cycles, and chemotherapy regimens were frequently reported predictors in the models. The applicability of the included studies was satisfactory; however, the overall risk of bias was high. Conclusion: While the risk prediction models for CIOM in patients with malignant tumours demonstrate good applicability, they carry a high risk of bias. Future research should focus on developing more targeted models with lower bias risks based on different tumour types and conduct internal and external validations. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42024532626.

Indexed as

drug therapyneoplasmspredictive learning modelsstomatitissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40909960
PMCPMC12404939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.