SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2025
Predictive models for chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk prediction models for blood transfusion in patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Influencing factors of oral frailty in elderly patients with head and neck cancer: a multicenter, cross-sectional study.BMC oral health · 2026Observational
- Regimen-Related Oral Mucosal Injury: Pathobiology, Clinical Consequences and Rationale for Intervention Across Cancer Treatment Modalities.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Cellulose-Based Hydrogels for Chronic Wound Healing: Bridging Biomaterial Design and Clinical Unmet Needs.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The cutaneous mirror: leveraging drug-induced skin phenotypes as early visual risk signals for systemic toxicity, a comprehensive review.Frontiers in drug safety and regulation · 2026Review
- Evidence-based nursing strategies for the prevention and management of oral mucositis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To critically appraise and synthesise existing risk prediction models for chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis (CIOM) in cancer patients, identifying their methodological strengths, limitations, and clinical utility to guide future model refinement. Methods: Relevant literature on CIOM risk prediction models published in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, VIP, and CBM was searched, covering the period from the inception of the databases to May 9, 2025. Researchers independently screened the literature and extracted data, utilising the Prediction Model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) to evaluate the quality of the models. Result: After deduplication, a total of 3,603 articles were identified, encompassing 8 studies that presented 11 models of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis. All 11 models reported the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, which ranged from 0.630 to 0.966. The combined AUC value of the 5 models was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.93). Five models reported calibration, 8 underwent internal validation, and only 4 underwent external validation. Age, oral hygiene, smoking history, chemotherapy cycles, and chemotherapy regimens were frequently reported predictors in the models. The applicability of the included studies was satisfactory; however, the overall risk of bias was high. Conclusion: While the risk prediction models for CIOM in patients with malignant tumours demonstrate good applicability, they carry a high risk of bias. Future research should focus on developing more targeted models with lower bias risks based on different tumour types and conduct internal and external validations. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42024532626.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.